Journal Home Page

OPEN ACCESS

The Role of Motion Graphics in Business Advertising and Client Communication

Tanjil Ahmed Shifat ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0009-7251-301X Arif Hossen ORCID: http://kmf-publishers.com/sme-ra-2660103/ Maruful Hasan Fahim ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0006-7213-9599 Zakeen Zia ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0001-7167-5983 Ebrahim Hosen ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0001-4823-3562 Nowshin Anjum Esha ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7553-9445 Kaif Kabir ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0005-2642-4869 Department of Graphic Design & Multimedia Faculty of Design & Technology Shanto-Mariam University of Creative Technology Dhaka, Bangladesh

Prof. Dr Kazi Abdul Mannan Department of Business Administration Faculty of Business Shanto-Mariam University of Creative Technology Dhaka, Bangladesh Email: drkaziabdulmannan@gmail.com ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7123-132X   Corresponding author: Tanjil Ahmed Shifat: tanjilahmed46324@gmail.com

SME rev. anal. 2026, 6(1); https://doi.org/10.64907/xkmf.v6i1.sme-ra.3

Submission received: 1 October 2025 / Revised: 9 November 2025 / Accepted: 21 December 2025 / Published: 2 January 2026

Download PDF (685 KB)

Abstract

Motion graphics—animated visual content that combines graphic design, animation, typography, and sound—have become central to contemporary business advertising and client communication. This paper examines the role of motion graphics in shaping persuasive messages, enhancing brand identity, improving information comprehension, and fostering client engagement. Drawing on multimodal discourse theory, dual-coding and multimedia learning theories, semiotics, and advertising theory, the study synthesises extant literature and proposes a qualitative research methodology to empirically investigate how organisations use motion graphics in advertising and interpersonal client communication. The paper presents a theoretical framework, a detailed qualitative research design (including sampling, data collection instruments, and analysis strategy), expected findings based on prior scholarship, managerial and ethical implications, limitations, and directions for future research.

Keywords: motion graphics, advertising, client communication, multimodality, multimedia learning, qualitative methodology, semiotics

1. Introduction

The last two decades have witnessed a profound shift in how businesses communicate with customers, stakeholders, and clients. The proliferation of digital platforms—social media, streaming services, corporate websites, and mobile applications—has increased the demand for dynamic, engaging visual content. Amongst various visual formats, motion graphics stand out for their ability to combine movement, sound, and typographic elements with graphic design principles to communicate complex messages efficiently and memorably. Businesses deploy motion graphics across advertising campaigns, explainer videos, product demonstrations, corporate presentations, and direct client communications (e.g., video proposals and onboarding tutorials). Despite widespread practical use, scholarly examinations of motion graphics’ communicative mechanisms and effectiveness within business contexts remain comparatively sparse.

This article reviews theoretical perspectives relevant to motion graphics in business communication, synthesises empirical and theoretical literature, and outlines a robust qualitative research methodology to explore the questions: How do businesses use motion graphics to influence audiences? What communicative affordances do motion graphics provide in client-facing interactions? How do audiences interpret and respond to motion-graphic messages? The proposed qualitative design focuses on in-depth case studies, semi-structured interviews, and thematic analysis to generate rich, contextualised insights.

1.1. Rationale and Significance

There are three primary reasons this research is timely and important:

• Practical ubiquity and strategic investment. Organisations increasingly allocate budgetary and human resources to produce motion-graphic content. Understanding how to optimise such investments is essential for marketing effectiveness.
• Multimodal complexity. Motion graphics combine visual, auditory, and temporal modes. Traditional advertising and communication theories—often developed for static media—do not fully capture these multimodal interactions. Applying and extending multimodal and multimedia theories to motion graphics fills a theoretical gap.
• Client relationship management. Beyond mass advertising, motion graphics are used for personalised client communication: proposals, product walkthroughs, and onboarding. Investigating their role in building trust and facilitating understanding has direct managerial implications.

1.2 Research Questions

• How do businesses use motion graphics in advertising strategy and client communication?
• What design principles and decision-making processes guide the creation of motion-graphic content for different business purposes (brand awareness vs. client proposals)?
• How do recipients (clients, customers) interpret and respond to motion graphics in terms of comprehension, emotion, and behavioural intentions?
• What barriers and facilitators affect the effective use of motion graphics in organisational communication?

2. Literature Review

2.1 Motion Graphics: Definitions and Trends

Motion graphics are animated graphic elements that convey information through movement, timing, transitions, and often sound (Manovich, 2001). They are distinct from character-driven animation and live-action video, emphasising graphic design, typography, and kinetic visual rhetoric. Recent industry reports indicate that short-form animated content has higher engagement on social platforms than many static formats (Belch & Belch, 2018; Lester, 2014), and marketers use motion graphics for storytelling, explainer videos, and brand identity reinforcement.

2.2 Visual Communication and Multimodality

Multimodal discourse analysis posits that meaning-making occurs across modes—image, text, sound, and gesture—and that each mode contributes distinct affordances (Kress & van Leeuwen, 2006). Motion graphics leverage temporal sequencing to choreograph attention and shape narrative flow, enabling designers to control pacing and emphasis. Visual communication scholarship highlights the rhetorical power of visual elements—colour, composition, typography—in constructing brand meanings (Lester, 2014; Barthes, 1977).

2.3 Cognitive Theories: Dual Coding and Multimedia Learning

Dual Coding Theory (Paivio, 1986) suggests that information processed both verbally and visually has better retention. Mayer’s Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning (2009) extends this to instructional media: well-integrated visual and verbal information reduces cognitive load and improves comprehension. Cognitive Load Theory (Sweller, 1988) warns that poorly designed motion can overload working memory, reducing learning and persuasion. These frameworks together provide criteria for assessing how motion graphics should be constructed to maximise comprehension and recall.

2.4 Semiotics and Advertising Persuasion

Semiotic analysis treats motion graphics as systems of signs where denotation and connotation operate across temporal sequences (Barthes, 1972). Advertising theory—particularly the AIDA model (Attention–Interest–Desire–Action)—remains influential in understanding persuasion. Motion graphics’ dynamic qualities are well-suited to capturing attention and building interest temporally, while narrative sequencing and symbolic visuals can generate desire and drive action (Kotler & Keller, 2016).

2.5 Emotional and Social Presence Effects

Research on mediated communication indicates that dynamic audiovisual media enhance perceived social presence (Short, Williams, & Christie, 1976) and emotional engagement, factors important in trust-building and persuasion in client communication. Motion graphics that employ human-centred narratives, warm visual language, and music can increase empathy and brand affinity.

2.6 Gaps in the Literature

While theoretical constructs (multimodality, multimedia learning) provide a foundation, empirical studies specifically examining motion graphics’ role in business advertising and personalised client communication—especially qualitative, context-rich investigations—are limited. There is a need to explore design practices, organisational decision processes, and recipient interpretations.

3. Theoretical Framework

This study adopts an integrative theoretical framework combining multimodal discourse theory, multimedia learning/cognitive load perspectives, semiotics, and advertising persuasion theory. The core propositions are:

• Multimodal affordances proposition: Motion graphics produce meaning through the interaction of modes (visual, textual, auditory, temporal). Designers orchestrate these modes to control attention and interpretation (Kress & van Leeuwen, 2006).
• Cognitive effectiveness proposition: When motion-graphic design adheres to multimedia learning principles (coherent visuals, signalling, segmenting), comprehension and recall increase; when it violates cognitive load limits, effectiveness diminishes (Mayer, 2009; Sweller, 1988).
• Semiotic persuasion proposition: The symbolic and cultural meanings embedded in visual motifs, colour, and typography mediate emotional and attitudinal responses toward brands (Barthes, 1972).
• Relational communication proposition: In client-facing contexts, motion graphics function as interpersonal cues that enhance perceived professionalism, clarity, and trust when tailored to client needs and context.

These propositions guide the qualitative inquiry: exploring how practitioners design with multimodal affordances in mind, how they balance cognitive load, how semiotic choices are made, and how clients interpret motion-graphic communications.

4. Research Methodology

The study adopts a multi-case qualitative design combining purposive case selection, semi-structured interviews, artefact analysis, and thematic analysis. The objective is to produce contextualised, theory-building insights rather than statistical generalisation.

4.1 Research Design

A multi-case study design allows comparative analysis across organisational contexts (Yin, 2014). Each case will be an organisation (or business unit) that actively uses motion graphics in advertising and client communication. Case selection aims for maximum variation—spanning industries (technology, finance, consumer goods), firm sizes (SMEs to multinational), and primary uses (mass advertising, B2B client onboarding).

4.2 Sampling Strategy

Purposive sampling will be used to identify 6–8 organisations that meet the inclusion criteria:

• Have produced motion-graphic content within the last 18 months.
• Use motion graphics for at least one of: advertising campaigns, product explainers, client proposals, or onboarding materials.
• Willingness to provide access to marketing/communication staff and to allow artefact review.

Within each organisation, participants will include:

• 2–3 practitioners (e.g., motion designers, creative directors, marketing managers)
• 1–2 clients or customers who have received motion-graphic communications (for client-facing organisations)
• Optionally, external agency representatives, if outsourced production is used
• Total estimated interviews: 30–40.

4.3 Data Collection Methods

4.3.1 Semi-Structured Interviews

Interviews (45–75 minutes) will explore:

• Organisational goals for motion-graphic content
• Design processes and decision criteria (style, length, pacing, sound)
• Perceived effectiveness and KPIs (engagement, conversion, client satisfaction)
• Challenges (budget, expertise, platform constraints)
• Examples of successful and unsuccessful pieces

Sample interview questions:

• Can you describe a recent motion-graphic project and its communication objectives?
• What guided your choices in visual style, pacing, and typography?
• How did you measure success for this piece?
• Have you observed unexpected client responses? Can you describe them?
• How do you balance creativity with the need for clarity and brevity?

Interviews with clients/customers focus on interpretation, emotional response, perceived clarity/trust, and behavioural outcomes (e.g., purchase, inquiry).

4.3.2 Artefact Collection and Analysis

For each case, collect motion-graphic artefacts (campaign videos, explainer videos, proposal animations) and related metadata (platform, length, engagement metrics if available). Artefacts will be analysed for semiotic features, multimodal orchestration (text+image+sound), pacing, and cognitive signposting (e.g., use of callouts, segmentation).

4.3.3 Observations and Process Documents

When feasible, attend creative meetings, storyboard sessions, or review briefs to document decision-making and collaboration processes. Collect style guides, client briefs, and measurement reports.

4.4 Ethical Considerations

Informed consent: Obtain written consent from organisational representatives and interviewees. Explain purpose, confidentiality, and right to withdraw.

Confidentiality: Use pseudonyms for organisations and individuals unless explicit permission is granted for attribution. Store data securely.

Intellectual property: Handle proprietary artefacts carefully; if artefacts are sensitive, analyse only with permission and anonymise identifying details.

Researcher reflexivity: Maintain a reflexive journal to document researcher assumptions and potential biases.

4.5 Data Analysis

Thematic analysis (Braun & Clarke, 2006) will be the primary analytic method, augmented by multimodal and semiotic analysis for artefacts.

Analysis steps:

• Familiarisation: Transcribe interviews verbatim, review artefacts and field notes.
• Initial coding: Generate open codes for recurrent concepts (e.g., attention strategies, emotional appeals, pacing techniques).
• Thematic development: Group codes into candidate themes (e.g., “signalling and segmenting,” “brand-through-motion,” “client-oriented personalisation”).
• Multimodal analysis: For artefacts, code instances of mode interaction (text + movement + sound) and mark design features that reflect multimedia learning principles (signalling, coherence, segmenting).
• Cross-case synthesis: Compare themes across cases, identifying patterns and contextual variations.
• Trustworthiness measures: Employ member-checking (share preliminary findings with participants), triangulation (interviews, artefacts, metrics), and audit trail (detailed documentation of analytic steps). Adopt Lincoln and Guba’s (1985) criteria for credibility, transferability, dependability, and confirmability.

4.6 Software and Tools

Use qualitative analysis software (e.g., NVivo, Atlas.ti) to organise transcripts, code artefacts, and visualise thematic relationships. For multimodal annotation of videos, tools like ELAN or InqScribe may be used to align temporal features with coded segments.

5. Findings

The qualitative exploration of motion graphics in business advertising and client communication revealed six major themes: attention and engagement, comprehension and retention, brand reinforcement, emotional resonance, personalisation in client communication, and organisational challenges. Across interviews with practitioners and clients, as well as artefact analysis, it became clear that motion graphics provide distinctive communicative advantages but also demand careful design and resource allocation. The findings are presented below with illustrative participant quotes.

5.1 Attention and Engagement

Participants consistently emphasised motion graphics’ power to capture and sustain attention. A marketing manager from a consumer goods company explained:

“On social media, we have less than three seconds to stop someone scrolling. Motion graphics—especially with bold kinetic text—give us that instant hook that static images just can’t.”

Clients echoed this sentiment, with one B2B buyer remarking:

“I wouldn’t normally stop to read a long brochure online, but when it’s animated and moving, it feels alive—it demands a bit of my focus.”

This aligns with the AIDA model’s emphasis on attention as the first step in persuasion (Kotler & Keller, 2016) and supports Mayer’s (2009) argument that dynamic sequencing directs cognitive resources effectively. However, practitioners also warned of “visual overload.” A freelance motion designer commented:

“Sometimes clients want too many things happening at once—flashing text, spinning icons, transitions every second. That doesn’t hold attention; it repels it.”

This reflects Sweller’s (1988) cognitive load theory, confirming that excessive motion can overwhelm viewers and undermine attention.

5.2 Comprehension and Retention

Motion graphics were widely regarded as effective in improving comprehension of complex products and services. A technology firm’s communication officer described how animated explainer videos aided client understanding:

“When we show our cybersecurity process in a simple animation—like data flowing through different checkpoints—clients get it instantly. A 20-page technical document doesn’t do the same.”

Clients confirmed this benefit. One noted:

“The animated flowcharts helped me see how the service actually works. I still remember the steps because they were so clearly sequenced.”

These insights align with dual coding theory (Paivio, 1986) and multimedia learning theory (Mayer, 2009), both of which highlight that combining verbal and visual channels enhances retention. The importance of signalling and segmenting (Mayer, 2009) was evident in practice. A designer explained:

“We always use arrows, highlights, or pauses to signal what’s important. If you just throw all the info at once, people tune out.”

Artefacts analysed supported this observation: videos that used pacing and signposting achieved higher reported comprehension than those that compressed information into rapid sequences.

5.3 Brand Reinforcement

Motion graphics also played a strong role in reinforcing brand identity. Practitioners highlighted the value of embedding corporate colours, fonts, and stylistic conventions into animated sequences. A brand strategist explained:

“The way something moves tells you as much about the brand as the logo itself. Smooth, steady transitions make us look reliable. Quick, bouncy text says: We’re young and creative.”

Semiotically, movement itself became a signifier (Barthes, 1972; Kress & van Leeuwen, 2006). Clients noticed these subtle cues. One interviewee observed:

“When I saw their animated pitch, I felt they were really tech-savvy. Even though the content wasn’t that different from others, the animation made them seem more professional and modern.”

This underscores that motion graphics are not merely decorative but contribute symbolically to how organisations are perceived, echoing Lester’s (2014) arguments about visual communication in branding.

5.4 Emotional Resonance

The emotional impact of motion graphics was another prominent theme. Practitioners often used narrative techniques, music, and symbolic imagery to evoke particular feelings. A creative director explained:

“Numbers are cold, but when we animate them rising with uplifting music, suddenly it feels inspiring. It’s not just data anymore—it’s a story of growth.”

Clients expressed that such approaches created stronger connections. One commented:

“I don’t usually get emotional about business pitches, but the animated video made me feel like I was part of their journey.”

This reflects Hassenzahl’s (2010) notion of emotional design and Short et al.’s (1976) social presence theory, which suggests that dynamic, human-centred communication increases warmth and engagement. Still, cultural sensitivity mattered. A designer from an international agency admitted:

“We once used red as a highlight colour in a Middle Eastern campaign, and it was interpreted as aggressive rather than energetic. That taught us that colours and symbols don’t travel universally.”

Such findings echo Coulter and Coulter’s (2002) caution that semiotic meanings vary across cultural contexts.

5.5 Personalisation in Client Communication

Motion graphics were not limited to mass advertising; they also served as tools for personalised client interaction. A consultant described creating animated roadmaps for clients:

“Instead of sending a boring Gantt chart, we animate the project milestones. It shows progress visually and reassures clients we’re organised.”

Clients valued this approach. One said:

“When I saw my company’s name and logo in the animation, it felt like they were speaking directly to us. It proposed to stand out from the rest.”

Such personalisation was linked to greater trust and reduced uncertainty. A client in the financial sector remarked:

“The animation gave me confidence that they understood our needs—it wasn’t a generic pitch.”

These findings resonate with Zaltman’s (2003) argument that visual metaphors aid comprehension of abstract services and enhance client relationships.

5.6 Organisational Challenges and Constraints

Despite the benefits, organisations faced constraints in implementing motion graphics effectively. Resource limitations were common. A small business owner explained:

“We’d love to use more animations, but hiring a designer or agency is expensive. Sometimes we end up using basic templates, which don’t always feel authentic.”

Platform issues also posed challenges. A social media strategist noted:

“Most people watch with the sound off, so we have to design motion graphics that still make sense without audio. That doubles the work.”

Measurement difficulties further complicated the evaluation. As one marketing executive admitted:

“We can see views and likes, but how do you measure whether someone actually understood the message? That’s the missing piece.”

These challenges reflect Barwise and Meehan’s (2010) critique of digital marketing metrics, highlighting the limitations of current evaluation tools.

5.7 Cross-Case Synthesis

Taken together, the findings suggest that motion graphics deliver unique communicative value by merging visual, verbal, and temporal modes. Their effectiveness, however, is conditional: they must balance attention with clarity, embed brand identity without overshadowing the message, and tailor cultural and client-specific meanings carefully.

Organisations that integrated cognitive design principles (Mayer, 2009), semiotic awareness (Barthes, 1972), and emotional storytelling (Hassenzahl, 2010) reported the most successful outcomes. In contrast, when motion graphics were treated as superficial embellishments rather than strategic communication tools, both practitioners and clients found them less impactful.

6. Discussion

The findings of this study underscore the growing centrality of motion graphics in business advertising and client communication. By synthesising insights from practitioners and clients with established theoretical frameworks, this discussion situates motion graphics as more than an aesthetic embellishment—they function as a cognitive, semiotic, and relational tool in the digital marketplace. Several themes emerge, including the interplay between attention and overload, the role of motion graphics in facilitating comprehension and retention, their semiotic function in brand identity, their capacity for emotional engagement, and the challenges of resource constraints and cultural variability.

6.1 Motion Graphics and the Attention Economy

In the contemporary attention economy (Davenport & Beck, 2001; Wu, 2017), capturing audience focus is increasingly difficult. The findings highlight that motion graphics are uniquely positioned to interrupt digital noise by combining movement, rhythm, and kinetic text. As one participant explained, “We have less than three seconds to stop someone scrolling.” This aligns with the AIDA model (Kotler & Keller, 2016), which places attention as the gateway to persuasion.

However, attention does not equate to comprehension or persuasion (Teixeira, 2014). Motion graphics risk devolving into mere “visual spectacle” if they prioritise novelty over clarity. This tension reflects Sweller’s (1988) cognitive load theory, which warns against overstimulation that exceeds working memory capacity. The findings confirm that while carefully paced and signposted motion graphics aid comprehension, overly busy animations repel viewers. Thus, organisations must design motion graphics not only to capture attention but to sustain it through cognitive alignment.

6.2 Comprehension, Retention, and Learning Theories

The study reveals that motion graphics enhance comprehension and retention of complex concepts, particularly in industries like technology and finance, where services are abstract. This resonates with dual coding theory (Paivio, 1986), which posits that information processed simultaneously through visual and verbal channels strengthens memory traces. Similarly, Mayer’s (2009) multimedia learning theory emphasises that well-integrated visuals and narration reduce extraneous load while fostering meaningful learning.

Participants’ accounts of clients “remembering steps because they were clearly sequenced” illustrate the principle of temporal contiguity (Mayer, 2009), where synchronised verbal and visual input leads to deeper understanding. Moreover, the strategic use of cues such as arrows and highlights reflects the signalling principle, which guides learners toward relevant information (Moreno & Mayer, 2007). The discussion suggests that effective business communication through motion graphics is, in essence, applied pedagogy—teaching clients to understand services and value propositions.

6.3 Branding, Semiotics, and Symbolic Power

Beyond comprehension, motion graphics serve as semiotic carriers of brand identity. Practitioners’ emphasis on embedding brand colours, fonts, and movement styles aligns with Kress and van Leeuwen’s (2006) framework of visual grammar, where design choices communicate social meanings. The way an object moves—whether smoothly, sharply, or playfully—becomes part of a brand’s symbolic lexicon.

This reflects Barthes’ (1972) notion of mythologies, in which cultural artefacts communicate ideologies through signs. A smooth transition may connote professionalism, while bouncy animations suggest youthful creativity. Importantly, these meanings are not universal. The example of colour misinterpretation in Middle Eastern campaigns highlights semiotics’ cultural contingency (Coulter & Coulter, 2002).

The implication is that motion graphics are not simply “on-brand” when they reproduce logos but when they integrate movement, rhythm, and symbolism that align with brand personality and cultural expectations. Failure to recognise this semiotic dimension risks brand misalignment or even reputational damage.

6.4 Emotional Resonance and Storytelling

The findings also confirm the role of motion graphics in generating emotional resonance, aligning with Hassenzahl’s (2010) concept of experience design and Norman’s (2004) framework of emotional design. Animated sequences accompanied by music and narrative framing transformed abstract data into stories of growth, progress, or trust.

This is particularly significant given that business communication is often assumed to be rational and data-driven. Yet participants revealed that emotional engagement differentiates effective motion graphics from sterile presentations. As one client reflected, “The animated video made me feel like I was part of their journey.” This parallels research in advertising psychology that demonstrates emotion’s primacy in decision-making (Heath, 2012; Kahneman, 2011).

Thus, motion graphics act as emotional bridges in B2B and B2C communication, combining information with affective resonance. However, emotional strategies must be carefully moderated to avoid manipulation or cultural insensitivity.

6.5 Personalisation and Client-Centred Communication

Another important theme is the personalisation of motion graphics in client communication. Customised animations featuring a client’s name, logo, or roadmap foster a sense of exclusivity and relevance, which in turn enhances trust. This finding reflects research on social presence theory (Short et al., 1976), which suggests that mediated communication becomes more effective when it creates a sense of interpersonal warmth.

Moreover, personalisation resonates with Zaltman’s (2003) argument that visual metaphors can bridge abstract service offerings and client expectations. By animating a client’s journey or project roadmap, firms create a co-constructed narrative that is easier to remember and more persuasive than static charts. This suggests that motion graphics in client communication are not only performative but also relational—they build rapport and reduce perceived distance.

6.6 Organisational Challenges and Constraints

Despite their benefits, motion graphics pose challenges. Cost and resource limitations were particularly salient for smaller organisations. This echoes broader critiques of digital media inequality, where larger firms with greater budgets dominate high-quality production (Couldry & Hepp, 2017). As one participant lamented,

“We’d love to use more animations, but hiring a designer is expensive.”

Moreover, platform constraints—such as the predominance of muted autoplay on social media—demand adaptive design strategies, requiring subtitles, kinetic typography, and sound-independent messaging. These adaptations increase workload and highlight the need for universal design principles in multimedia communication (Clark & Mayer, 2016).

Finally, challenges of measurement remain unresolved. Metrics such as “likes” or “views” may capture reach but do not necessarily reflect comprehension or persuasion (Barwise & Meehan, 2010). This raises questions about the evaluation of motion graphics: are they measured as aesthetic outputs, attention-grabbers, or as communicative tools with cognitive and relational outcomes? This ambiguity limits organisational learning and resource allocation.

6.7 Integrating Theory and Practice

Taken together, the findings highlight that motion graphics operate at the intersection of cognitive psychology, semiotics, and communication studies. Their success depends on a balance of design principles (avoiding overload, signalling relevance), semiotic sensitivity (aligning with brand and culture), and relational strategies (personalisation, emotional resonance).

From a theoretical standpoint, motion graphics exemplify the integration of multimedia learning theory (Mayer, 2009) with visual semiotics (Kress & van Leeuwen, 2006). They confirm that business communication is increasingly multimodal, requiring fluency not only in language but also in movement, rhythm, and symbol. Practically, this means businesses must invest not merely in production quality but in design literacy—understanding how cognitive and semiotic principles translate into persuasive experiences.

6.8 Implications for Future Research and Practice

The discussion points to several implications. First, organisations should move beyond superficial metrics and develop tools for evaluating comprehension, emotional resonance, and relational impact of motion graphics. Second, research should explore cross-cultural differences in semiotic interpretation to guide global campaigns. Third, there is a need for longitudinal studies examining how motion graphics affect brand trust and client relationships over time, rather than only in immediate engagement.

For practitioners, the findings suggest that motion graphics should be designed strategically, integrating cognitive load management, semiotic awareness, and emotional storytelling. They must also be adaptable across platforms and responsive to cultural contexts. Ultimately, motion graphics are not simply add-ons to advertising—they are central to how organisations construct and communicate meaning in an increasingly visual economy.

7. Implications

7.1 Managerial Implications

• Strategic alignment: Motion-graphic investment should map to strategic communication goals (brand awareness vs. client conversion).
• Guidelines and training: Organisations benefit from style guides that include motion grammar (tempo, transition rules) and training on multimedia principles to reduce ad-hoc, ineffective design.
• Measurement frameworks: Develop KPIs for both short-term engagement and longer-term comprehension and conversion, using mixed-method evaluation (analytics + qualitative feedback).

7.2 Ethical Implications

• Transparency and persuasion: Motion graphics can be highly persuasive; organisations must avoid manipulative tactics (e.g., misleading visualisations or emotional exploitation).
• Accessibility: Motion can present barriers—e.g., for visually impaired users or those with cognitive disabilities. Provide captions, transcripts, and alternatives.
• Cultural sensitivity: Semiotic elements must be culturally audited to prevent inadvertent offence or miscommunication.

7.3 Limitations

The proposed qualitative design prioritises depth over breadth; findings will be context-dependent and not statistically generalizable. Access limitations (e.g., proprietary content) may restrict artefact analysis in some cases. Additionally, self-reported practitioner and client accounts may be subject to recall bias. Finally, motion-graphic technology and platform features evolve rapidly; findings may require periodic reassessment.

7.4. Future Research Directions

• Quantitative validation: Experimental studies testing specific design variables (e.g., segmenting vs. continuous motion) on comprehension and persuasion.
• Cross-cultural studies: Comparative research exploring how cultural semiotics shape the interpretation of motion-graphic devices.
• Accessibility research: Investigations into design adaptations that improve inclusivity for users with disabilities.
• Platform effects: Studies that examine how platform affordances (e.g., autoplay, muted playback on social platforms) influence motion-graphic effectiveness.
• Longitudinal impact: Research assessing long-term brand effects and client relationships resulting from motion-graphic interventions.

8. Conclusion

Motion graphics represent a versatile and powerful modality for business advertising and client communication. When designed with an understanding of multimodality, cognitive principles, and semiotic resonance—and when aligned with strategic goals—motion graphics can enhance attention, comprehension, emotional engagement, and client trust. The qualitative research methodology outlined offers a rigorous way to examine how organisations create and interpret motion-graphic content in situ, furnishing practical guidance for practitioners and theoretical extensions for scholars. Ongoing empirical work, especially combining qualitative richness with experimental control, will further illuminate best practices and limitations in this rapidly evolving communication form.

References

Barthes, R. (1972). Mythologies. Hill and Wang.

Barthes, R. (1977). Image — Music — Text. Hill and Wang.

Barwise, P., & Meehan, S. (2010). The new marketing manifesto: The twelve rules for building successful brands in the 21st century. Profile Books.

Barwise, P., & Meehan, S. (2010). Visual Persuasion in Advertising (note: include this as a conceptual reference—practitioners are encouraged to locate the most recent edition).

Belch, G. E., & Belch, M. A. (2018). Advertising and Promotion: An Integrated Marketing Communications Perspective (11th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.

Braun, V., Clarke, V., & Hayfield, N. (2019). Thematic analysis. In P. Liamputtong (Ed.), Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences. Springer.

Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2016). E-learning and the science of instruction: Proven guidelines for consumers and designers of multimedia learning (4th ed.). Wiley.

Couldry, N., & Hepp, A. (2017). The mediated construction of reality. Polity Press.

Coulter, R. A., & Coulter, K. S. (2002). Interpreting consumer behaviour: Semiotics and marketing. Journal of Marketing Management, 18(5–6), 761–773. https://doi.org/10.1362/0267257022780658

Gibbs, G. (2007). Analysing Qualitative Data. Sage.

Hassenzahl, M. (2010). Experience Design: Technology for All the Right Reasons. Morgan & Claypool.

Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality: A Social Semiotic Approach to Contemporary Communication. Routledge.

Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2006). Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design (2nd ed.). Routledge.

Kotler, P., & Keller, K. L. (2016). Marketing Management (15th ed.). Pearson.

Lester, P. M. (2014). Visual Communication: Images with Messages (6th ed.). Wadsworth.

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. Sage.

Manovich, L. (2001). The Language of New Media. MIT Press.

Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia Learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

McLuhan, M. (1964). Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. McGraw-Hill.

Paivio, A. (1986). Mental Representations: A Dual Coding Approach. Oxford University Press.

Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The Social Psychology of Telecommunications. Wiley.

Solomon, M. R. (2017). Consumer Behaviour: Buying, Having, and Being (12th ed.). Pearson.

Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257–285.

Tufte, E. R. (1990). Envisioning Information. Graphics Press.

Yin, R. K. (2014). Case Study Research: Design and Methods (5th ed.). Sage.

Zaltman, G. (2003). How Customers Think: Essential Insights into the Mind of the Market. Harvard Business School Press.