Journal Home Page

OPEN ACCESS

Exploring Consumer Perceptions of Fashion Brand Identity through Secondary Media Analysis

Tunazzina Edi ORCID: https://orcid.org/ Jannatul Mashfuka ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0002-3181-9206 Sanjida Sultana Reshmi ORCID: https://orcid.org/ Department of Fashion Design & Technology Faculty of Design & Technology Shanto-Mariam University of Creative Technology Dhaka, Bangladesh

Prof. Dr Kazi Abdul Mannan Department of Business Administration Faculty of Business Shanto-Mariam University of Creative Technology Dhaka, Bangladesh Email: drkaziabdulmannan@gmail.com ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7123-132X   Corresponding author: Tunazzina Edi: tunazzinaoishi@gmail.com

Percept. motiv. attitude stud. 2026, 5(2); https://doi.org/10.64907/xkmf.v5i2.pmas.12

Submission received: 2 April 2026 / Revised: 20 May 2026 / Accepted: 25 May 2026 / Published: 29 May 2026

Download (PDF)

Abstract

This study explores how consumers perceive fashion brand identity through the analysis of secondary media, including digital advertisements, social media content, and fashion editorials. In an increasingly digitised and participatory media environment, brand identity is no longer solely constructed by firms but co-created through ongoing interactions between brands, influencers, and consumers. Drawing on Kapferer’s Brand Identity Prism, symbolic interactionism, and cultural branding theory, the research adopts a qualitative methodology based on thematic analysis of secondary data. The findings reveal that consumer perceptions are shaped by visual symbolism, narrative coherence, influencer authenticity, and alignment with socio-cultural values. Moreover, digital media platforms facilitate active consumer participation, transforming brand identity into a dynamic and negotiated construct. The study highlights the importance of authenticity, consistency, and cultural relevance in contemporary fashion branding. By emphasising the interpretive role of consumers and the mediating function of digital media, this research contributes to a deeper understanding of brand identity as a socially constructed phenomenon within consumer culture.

Keywords: fashion brand identity, consumer perception, digital media, symbolic consumption, cultural branding, qualitative research, secondary data analysis

1. Introduction

The global fashion industry has undergone a profound transformation in the past two decades, driven by rapid technological advancements, the proliferation of digital media, and evolving consumer expectations. In this dynamic landscape, fashion brands are no longer defined solely by the physical attributes of their products; rather, they are increasingly constructed through symbolic meanings, narratives, and mediated representations that shape how consumers perceive and engage with them. Brand identity, therefore, has emerged as a critical strategic asset in the fashion sector, serving as a means of differentiation, value creation, and consumer connection (Kapferer, 2012).

Fashion, as a cultural and communicative system, plays a significant role in expressing individual and collective identities. Consumers do not simply purchase clothing for functional purposes; they engage with fashion brands as symbolic resources that help articulate their self-concept, social positioning, and lifestyle aspirations (Belk, 1988; Solomon, 2018). Consequently, understanding how consumers perceive fashion brand identity is essential for both scholars and practitioners seeking to navigate the complexities of contemporary consumer culture.

The rise of digital media platforms has further intensified the importance of brand identity in fashion. Platforms such as Instagram, TikTok, and YouTube have become central arenas for brand communication, enabling companies to disseminate curated visual content, engage with audiences in real time, and cultivate immersive brand experiences. These platforms have also democratized content creation, allowing consumers, influencers, and other stakeholders to participate actively in shaping brand narratives (Kozinets et al., 2010). As a result, brand identity is no longer solely controlled by firms but is co-constructed through ongoing interactions between brands and consumers.

In this context, secondary media sources-such as advertisements, social media posts, fashion editorials, and digital campaigns-serve as rich sites for examining how brand identity is constructed and interpreted. Unlike primary data collection methods, which often rely on self-reported perceptions, secondary media analysis enables researchers to investigate naturally occurring representations of brand identity and consumer engagement (Heaton, 2004). This approach is particularly valuable in the fashion domain, where visual and symbolic elements play a central role in communication.

Despite the growing importance of digital media in shaping brand identity, existing research has often focused on either brand-driven communication strategies or consumer responses in isolation. There remains a need for integrative studies that examine the interplay between media representations and consumer interpretation. Moreover, while quantitative approaches have provided valuable insights into brand perception, they may not fully capture the nuanced and context-dependent meanings that consumers derive from fashion media. A qualitative approach, grounded in interpretive analysis, is therefore well suited to exploring the complexities of brand identity in a media-saturated environment.

This study seeks to address these gaps by exploring consumer perceptions of fashion brand identity through the analysis of secondary media sources. By examining how brands present themselves across various media platforms and how these representations are interpreted by consumers, the research aims to provide a deeper understanding of the processes through which brand identity is constructed, communicated, and negotiated.

The study is guided by three key research questions:

• How is fashion brand identity constructed in secondary media representations?
• How do consumers interpret and respond to these representations?
• What role does digital media play in shaping and mediating consumer perceptions of brand identity?

To address these questions, the research adopts a qualitative methodology based on thematic analysis of selected media content. The study draws on established theoretical frameworks, including Kapferer’s (2012) brand identity prism, symbolic interactionism (Blumer, 1969), and cultural branding theory (Holt, 2004), to inform the analysis and interpretation of findings.

The significance of this research lies in its contribution to both academic and practical domains. From an academic perspective, the study advances understanding of brand identity as a socially constructed and media-mediated phenomenon. It also demonstrates the value of secondary data analysis in consumer research, particularly in contexts where visual and symbolic communication is central. From a practical standpoint, the findings offer insights for fashion marketers and brand managers seeking to develop effective communication strategies in an increasingly complex media environment.

In conclusion, this study positions fashion brand identity as a dynamic and contested construct that emerges through the interaction of brand communication, media representation, and consumer interpretation. By focusing on secondary media analysis, it provides a nuanced perspective on how brand meanings are produced and negotiated in the digital age.

2. Literature Review

Brand identity has been widely recognised as a foundational concept in marketing and branding literature. It refers to the unique set of associations that a brand aspires to create and maintain in the minds of consumers (Aaker, 1996). These associations encompass both tangible elements, such as product attributes and design features, and intangible aspects, including values, personality, and cultural meaning.

Kapferer (2012) provides a comprehensive framework for understanding brand identity through his Brand Identity Prism, which includes six dimensions: physique, personality, culture, relationship, reflection, and self-image. This model emphasises that brand identity is multifaceted and must be consistently communicated across all touchpoints to achieve coherence and recognition.

In the context of fashion, brand identity is particularly salient due to the industry’s emphasis on aesthetics, symbolism, and lifestyle representation. Fashion brands often construct identities that resonate with specific consumer segments, such as luxury consumers seeking exclusivity or younger audiences drawn to trend-driven styles (Barnes & Lea-Greenwood, 2010). The visual and performative nature of fashion further amplifies the importance of identity, as brands rely heavily on imagery, storytelling, and experiential marketing to convey their positioning.

2.1 Consumer Perception and Symbolic Consumption

Consumer perception is a complex process involving the selection, organisation, and interpretation of sensory information (Solomon, 2018). In the realm of branding, perception is shaped not only by direct interactions with products but also by mediated representations and social influences.

Symbolic consumption theory provides a valuable lens for understanding the relationship between consumers and brands. According to Belk (1988), consumers use products and brands as extensions of the self, incorporating them into their identity construction processes. This perspective is particularly relevant in fashion, where clothing and accessories serve as visible markers of identity and social status.

Escalas and Bettman (2005) further argue that consumers form connections with brands that align with their self-concept, a process known as self-brand congruity. When consumers perceive a strong alignment between a brand’s identity and their own values or aspirations, they are more likely to develop emotional attachment and loyalty.

However, consumer perception is not static; it is influenced by contextual factors, including cultural norms, peer influence, and media exposure. This dynamic nature underscores the importance of examining how brand identity is interpreted within specific socio-cultural and media environments.

2.2 Media Representation and Digital Branding

Media plays a central role in shaping brand identity by providing the channels through which brands communicate with consumers. Traditional media, such as print advertisements and television commercials, have long been used to construct and disseminate brand narratives. However, the advent of digital media has fundamentally altered the landscape of brand communication.

Arvidsson (2006) conceptualises brands as “ethical surplus,” meaning that their value is derived from the social and cultural meanings attached to them rather than their functional attributes. Digital media platforms have amplified this phenomenon by enabling continuous interaction between brands and consumers.

Social media, in particular, has transformed branding into a participatory process. Kozinets et al. (2010) introduce the concept of “networked narratives,” where brand stories are co-created by multiple actors, including consumers, influencers, and online communities. This participatory dynamic challenges traditional top-down models of brand communication and highlights the importance of engagement and authenticity.

Influencer marketing has emerged as a key strategy within digital branding. Influencers act as intermediaries who translate brand identity into relatable content, thereby shaping consumer perception. However, the effectiveness of influencer marketing depends on perceived authenticity and alignment between the influencer’s persona and the brand’s identity (Djafarova & Rushworth, 2017).

2.3 Cultural Branding and Societal Context

Cultural branding theory emphasises the role of brands in addressing broader societal issues and cultural tensions. Holt (2004) argues that iconic brands achieve success by resonating with prevailing cultural narratives and offering symbolic solutions to identity-related challenges.

In the fashion industry, cultural branding is evident in campaigns that address themes such as diversity, sustainability, and gender inclusivity. These themes reflect shifting societal values and consumer expectations, particularly among younger generations who prioritise ethical and socially responsible consumption (McNeill & Moore, 2015).

However, the integration of social issues into branding also presents challenges. Consumers are increasingly sceptical of superficial or performative efforts, often referred to as “woke washing.” Authenticity and consistency are therefore critical for maintaining credibility and trust.

2.4 Secondary Data Analysis in Consumer Research

Secondary data analysis involves the use of existing data to answer new research questions (Heaton, 2004). In the context of media and consumer research, secondary data sources include advertisements, social media content, and editorial materials.

This approach offers several advantages. First, it allows researchers to access a wide range of data without the time and resource constraints associated with primary data collection. Second, it provides insights into real-world practices and representations, enhancing ecological validity. Third, it enables the analysis of visual and textual content that may be difficult to capture through traditional methods.

However, secondary data analysis also presents limitations, such as the lack of control over data quality and the absence of direct access to participants’ perspectives. To address these challenges, researchers must adopt rigorous analytical frameworks and triangulate findings where possible.

2.5 Research Gap

While existing literature has extensively examined brand identity, consumer perception, and digital media, there is a relative lack of studies that integrate these domains through qualitative analysis of secondary media. Most research has focused either on brand strategies or consumer responses, with limited attention to the mediating role of media representations.

This study addresses this gap by adopting a holistic approach that considers both the construction and interpretation of brand identity within a media-saturated environment. By focusing on fashion brands, it also contributes to a deeper understanding of symbolic consumption and cultural meaning in a highly visual and dynamic industry.

3. Theoretical Framework

This study is grounded in an interdisciplinary theoretical framework that integrates branding theory, sociological perspectives on meaning-making, and cultural analysis. Specifically, it draws on Kapferer’s Brand Identity Prism, symbolic interactionism, and cultural branding theory. Together, these frameworks provide a comprehensive lens for understanding how fashion brand identity is constructed in media and interpreted by consumers.

3.1 Kapferer’s Brand Identity Prism

Kapferer’s (2012) Brand Identity Prism is one of the most influential models in branding literature, offering a multidimensional approach to understanding how brands communicate their identity. The model consists of six interrelated facets: physique, personality, culture, relationship, reflection, and self-image. These dimensions collectively capture both the external expression of the brand and the internalisation of the brand by consumers.

The “physique” facet refers to the tangible and visual elements of a brand, such as logos, colours, and product design. In the fashion industry, this dimension is particularly salient, as visual aesthetics play a central role in brand differentiation. The “personality” facet encompasses the human characteristics attributed to a brand, often conveyed through tone, style, and communication strategies. For instance, a fashion brand may present itself as youthful, rebellious, or sophisticated.

The “culture” dimension reflects the values and principles embedded within the brand, which often draw on national, organisational, or ideological influences. In contemporary fashion branding, cultural values such as sustainability and inclusivity have become increasingly prominent (McNeill & Moore, 2015). The “relationship” facet describes the type of interaction a brand seeks to establish with its consumers, ranging from transactional to emotional or even aspirational.

The “reflection” and “self-image” facets address how the brand represents its target audience and how consumers perceive themselves when engaging with the brand. These dimensions are closely linked to identity construction, as consumers often use brands to project and reinforce their desired self-concept (Belk, 1988).

In this study, Kapferer’s framework is used as an analytical tool to decode how fashion brands construct identity through secondary media. By examining each facet across different media representations, the research identifies patterns of consistency and divergence in brand communication.

3.2 Symbolic Interactionism

Symbolic interactionism provides a sociological perspective on how meaning is created and negotiated through social interaction. Rooted in the work of Blumer (1969), this theory posits that individuals interpret and assign meaning to objects, symbols, and interactions based on shared social understandings.

In the context of fashion branding, symbolic interactionism is particularly relevant because brands function as symbolic entities. Consumers do not simply respond to the functional attributes of a product; they interpret the symbolic meanings conveyed through brand imagery, narratives, and associations. These meanings are not fixed but are continuously shaped through interaction with media, peers, and broader cultural contexts.

Digital media platforms have intensified the processes described by symbolic interactionism by enabling real-time interaction and feedback. Consumers engage with brand content through likes, comments, shares, and user-generated posts, contributing to the ongoing construction of brand meaning (Kozinets et al., 2010). This participatory dynamic underscores the importance of viewing brand identity as a co-created phenomenon rather than a top-down construct.

Furthermore, symbolic interactionism highlights the role of interpretation in shaping consumer perception. Different consumers may interpret the same brand message in diverse ways depending on their personal experiences, cultural background, and social context. This variability is particularly significant in the global fashion industry, where brands must navigate diverse audiences and cultural expectations.

In this study, symbolic interactionism informs the analysis of how consumers engage with and interpret media representations of fashion brands. It emphasises the active role of consumers in meaning-making and the importance of context in shaping perception.

3.3 Cultural Branding Theory

Cultural branding theory, as articulated by Holt (2004), offers a macro-level perspective on how brands achieve cultural relevance and resonance. According to this theory, successful brands become “icons” by addressing societal tensions and providing symbolic solutions that resonate with collective identity concerns.

In the fashion industry, cultural branding is evident in campaigns that engage with social and political issues, such as sustainability, gender equality, and diversity. These campaigns often position brands as agents of cultural change, aligning them with the values and aspirations of contemporary consumers (McNeill & Moore, 2015).

Cultural branding also emphasises the importance of storytelling and myth-making in brand communication. Brands create narratives that connect with cultural discourses, enabling consumers to derive meaning and identity from their engagement with the brand. For example, a fashion brand that promotes ethical production practices may appeal to consumers seeking to align their consumption with environmental values.

However, cultural branding also involves risks. As consumers become more critical and informed, they are increasingly able to identify inconsistencies between a brand’s stated values and its actual practices. This has led to growing scepticism toward superficial or opportunistic branding efforts, highlighting the need for authenticity and transparency.

In this study, cultural branding theory is used to examine how fashion brands position themselves within broader cultural narratives and how these positions influence consumer perception. It provides a framework for analysing the socio-cultural dimensions of brand identity and the ways in which brands engage with contemporary issues.

3.4 Integration of Theoretical Perspectives

The integration of these three theoretical frameworks enables a comprehensive analysis of fashion brand identity. Kapferer’s model provides a structured approach to analysing brand communication, symbolic interactionism offers insights into consumer interpretation, and cultural branding theory situates brand identity within broader societal contexts.

Together, these perspectives highlight the dynamic and relational nature of brand identity, emphasising that it is constructed through ongoing interactions between brands, media, and consumers. This integrated framework guides the analysis of secondary media data and informs the interpretation of findings in this study.

4. Methodology

This study adopts a qualitative research design grounded in interpretivist epistemology. The interpretivist approach is appropriate for exploring complex social phenomena, such as consumer perceptions and brand identity, which are inherently subjective and context-dependent (Denzin & Lincoln, 2018). Rather than seeking to establish causal relationships or generalizable findings, the study aims to generate in-depth insights into how meanings are constructed and interpreted within specific media contexts.

The research employs secondary data analysis as its primary methodological approach. Secondary data analysis involves the systematic examination of existing data sources to address new research questions (Heaton, 2004). In this case, the data consist of various forms of media content that represent fashion brand identity, including advertisements, social media posts, and editorial materials.

4.1 Data Sources and Sampling Strategy

The study utilises a purposive sampling strategy to select relevant data sources. Purposive sampling allows researchers to identify cases that are particularly informative and aligned with the research objectives (Patton, 2015). The sample includes a diverse range of fashion brands representing different market segments, such as luxury, premium, and fast fashion.

Data were collected from multiple secondary media sources, including:

• Official brand advertisements (print and digital)
• Social media platforms (Instagram, TikTok, YouTube)
• Online fashion editorials and magazines
• Brand campaign videos and promotional materials

These sources were selected because they play a central role in shaping and disseminating brand identity. Social media platforms, in particular, were prioritised due to their interactive nature and widespread use among consumers.

The sampling process involved selecting a set of brands with strong digital presence and identifiable brand identities. For each brand, a corpus of media content was compiled, focusing on recent campaigns and posts to ensure relevance to contemporary consumer culture.

4.2 Data Collection Procedures

Data collection was conducted through systematic online searches and archival retrieval of media content. Screenshots, video captures, and textual descriptions were recorded to create a comprehensive dataset. Each data item was catalogued with relevant metadata, including the source, date, platform, and context of publication.

To ensure consistency, inclusion criteria were established for selecting data:

• The content must be publicly accessible.
• It must originate from official brand channels or widely recognised media outlets.
• It must contain identifiable elements of brand identity, such as visual aesthetics, messaging, or narrative themes.

This systematic approach enhances the transparency and replicability of the research process.

4.3 Data Analysis: Thematic Analysis

The study employs thematic analysis as the primary method of data analysis. Thematic analysis is a flexible and widely used qualitative method for identifying, analysing, and interpreting patterns within data (Braun & Clarke, 2006).

The analysis followed six key phases:

• Familiarisation: The researcher immersed themselves in the data by reviewing all collected materials multiple times.
• Initial Coding: Data were coded systematically to identify meaningful units related to brand identity and consumer perception.
• Theme Development: Codes were grouped into broader themes that capture recurring patterns across the dataset.
• Reviewing Themes: Themes were refined to ensure coherence and distinctiveness.
• Defining and Naming Themes: Each theme was clearly defined and linked to the research questions.
• Interpretation: Themes were interpreted in relation to the theoretical framework and existing literature.

Both deductive and inductive coding approaches were used. Deductive coding was guided by the theoretical frameworks (e.g., Kapferer’s dimensions), while inductive coding allowed new themes to emerge from the data.

4.4 Trustworthiness and Rigour

To ensure the credibility and rigour of the study, several strategies were employed. Credibility was enhanced through prolonged engagement with the data and systematic analysis procedures. Transferability was addressed by providing detailed descriptions of the research context and methodology, allowing readers to assess the applicability of findings to other contexts.

Dependability was ensured by maintaining a clear audit trail of data collection and analysis प्रक्रures. Confirmability was addressed by grounding interpretations in the data and minimising researcher bias through reflexive practices.

4.5 Ethical Considerations

The study relies exclusively on publicly available secondary data, which reduces ethical concerns related to participant consent and confidentiality. However, ethical considerations were still taken into account, particularly in relation to the use and representation of media content.

All data were used in accordance with fair use principles, and sources were properly acknowledged. Care was taken to avoid misrepresentation or selective interpretation of content (Mannan & Farhana, 2026). Additionally, the study refrains from making evaluative judgments about specific brands, focusing instead on analytical insights.

4.6 Limitations of the Methodology

While secondary data analysis offers several advantages, it also has limitations. One key limitation is the lack of direct access to consumer perspectives, which may constrain the depth of interpretation. The study relies on observable media interactions rather than self-reported data, which may not fully capture underlying motivations.

Another limitation is the potential for selection bias in the sampling process. Although purposive sampling is appropriate for qualitative research, it may limit the generalizability of findings. Furthermore, the rapidly evolving nature of digital media means that the data represent a specific moment in time and may not reflect future trends.

Despite these limitations, the methodology is well-suited to the research objectives and provides valuable insights into the construction and perception of fashion brand identity in contemporary media environments.

5. Findings and Analysis

The analysis of secondary media content across selected fashion brands reveals a complex and multi-layered construction of brand identity. Through thematic analysis, five dominant themes emerged: visual symbolism and aesthetic consistency, narrative construction and storytelling,  influencer mediation and authenticity, cultural alignment and value signalling, and consumer co-creation of brand meaning. These themes collectively illustrate how fashion brand identity is both strategically constructed and dynamically interpreted within digital media environments.

5.1 Visual Symbolism and Aesthetic Consistency

Visual symbolism emerged as a foundational element in the construction of fashion brand identity. Across all media platforms, brands consistently employed distinctive visual codes-including colour palettes, typography, spatial composition, and stylistic motifs-to create recognisable and coherent identities. These visual elements align closely with the “physique” dimension of Kapferer’s (2012) Brand Identity Prism, emphasising the tangible and sensory aspects of branding.

Luxury fashion brands, for instance, frequently utilise minimalist aesthetics, monochromatic colour schemes, and high-contrast imagery to convey sophistication, exclusivity, and timelessness. In contrast, fast fashion brands adopted vibrant colours, dynamic compositions, and diverse models to signal accessibility, trendiness, and inclusivity. These visual strategies are not arbitrary; they are carefully curated to align with the brand’s positioning and target audience (Barnes & Lea-Greenwood, 2010).

Consumers interpret these visual cues as symbolic representations of brand values. For example, muted tones and clean lines are often associated with elegance and refinement, while bold colours and eclectic styling suggest creativity and youthfulness. This interpretive process reflects the principles of symbolic interactionism, where meaning is derived from socially shared symbols and contextual cues (Blumer, 1969).

Moreover, consistency across media platforms was found to be critical in reinforcing brand identity. Brands that maintained a coherent visual language across advertisements, social media posts, and editorial features were more likely to be perceived as authentic and trustworthy. In contrast, inconsistencies in visual presentation led to ambiguity and weakened brand recognition. This finding underscores the importance of integrated marketing communication in sustaining a unified brand image.

5.2 Narrative Construction and Storytelling

Beyond visual elements, narrative construction plays a central role in shaping brand identity. Fashion brands increasingly rely on storytelling to create emotional connections with consumers and to embed their products within broader cultural and social narratives. These narratives often revolve around themes such as empowerment, individuality, sustainability, and social justice.

The analysis revealed that successful brand narratives are characterised by coherence, relevance, and emotional resonance. For instance, campaigns that portray stories of personal transformation or collective empowerment tend to evoke strong emotional responses and foster deeper engagement. This aligns with Holt’s (2004) cultural branding theory, which emphasises the role of storytelling in addressing societal tensions and creating symbolic meaning.

However, the effectiveness of storytelling depends on the perceived authenticity of the narrative. Consumers are highly sensitive to discrepancies between a brand’s communicated values and its actual practices. When narratives are perceived as inauthentic or opportunistic, they can generate scepticism and negative sentiment. This phenomenon is particularly evident in campaigns that attempt to capitalise on social issues without demonstrating a genuine commitment.

Furthermore, digital media platforms enable the extension and fragmentation of brand narratives. A single campaign may be disseminated across multiple formats-videos, images, captions, and user-generated content-each contributing to the overall narrative. This multi-modal storytelling enhances engagement but also introduces complexity, as different elements may be interpreted differently by diverse audiences.

5.3 Influencer Mediation and Perceived Authenticity

Influencers have become key intermediaries in the communication of fashion brand identity. Through partnerships with brands, influencers translate brand messages into personalised and relatable content, thereby shaping how consumers perceive and engage with the brand. This phenomenon reflects the shift toward networked narratives in digital branding (Kozinets et al., 2010).

The analysis indicates that influencer effectiveness is largely determined by perceived authenticity and congruence with the brand’s identity. Influencers who align closely with a brand’s values, aesthetics, and target audience are more likely to enhance brand credibility and appeal. Conversely, mismatches between influencer persona and brand identity can lead to dissonance and reduced trust.

Consumers often evaluate influencer content through a critical lens, assessing factors such as transparency, consistency, and sincerity. Sponsored content that is perceived as overly commercial or insincere may be dismissed or even criticised. This highlights the importance of maintaining a balance between promotional objectives and authentic self-expression in influencer collaborations (Djafarova & Rushworth, 2017).

Additionally, influencers contribute to the diversification of brand identity by introducing multiple perspectives and interpretations. While this can enrich the brand narrative, it also poses challenges for maintaining consistency and control. Brands must therefore navigate the tension between leveraging influencer creativity and preserving a coherent identity.

5.4 Cultural Alignment and Value Signalling

Cultural alignment emerged as a significant factor influencing consumer perception of fashion brand identity. Brands increasingly engage with social and cultural issues, positioning themselves as advocates for causes such as sustainability, diversity, and ethical production. These efforts reflect broader shifts in consumer values and expectations, particularly among younger demographics (McNeill & Moore, 2015).

Media representations that emphasise inclusivity, such as the use of diverse models and representation of different body types, were generally perceived positively. Similarly, campaigns highlighting sustainable practices and environmental responsibility resonated with consumers who prioritise ethical consumption.

However, the analysis also revealed a growing scepticism toward what is often termed “performative branding.” Consumers are increasingly aware of the gap between symbolic gestures and substantive action. Brands that fail to demonstrate genuine commitment to their stated values risk being perceived as inauthentic, which can undermine trust and loyalty.

This dynamic illustrates the relevance of cultural branding theory, which emphasises the need for brands to engage meaningfully with cultural narratives rather than merely appropriating them for commercial gain (Holt, 2004). Authenticity, transparency, and consistency are therefore critical in aligning brand identity with cultural values.

5.5 Consumer Co-Creation of Brand Meaning

One of the most significant findings of this study is the active role of consumers in co-creating brand identity. Digital media platforms facilitate continuous interaction between brands and consumers, enabling users to comment, share, remix, and reinterpret brand content. This participatory dynamic transforms brand identity from a static construct into an evolving and negotiated phenomenon.

User-generated content, in particular, plays a crucial role in shaping brand perception. Consumers often create and share their own interpretations of brand identity through outfit posts, reviews, and commentary. These contributions can reinforce or challenge the brand’s intended image, highlighting the decentralised nature of meaning-making in digital environments.

The co-creation process also reflects the principles of symbolic interactionism, where meaning is constructed through social interaction and shared interpretation (Blumer, 1969). Consumers do not passively receive brand messages; they actively engage with and reinterpret them based on their own experiences and social contexts.

Moreover, the visibility of consumer responses-such as comments and reviews-creates a feedback loop that influences both other consumers and the brand itself. Positive engagement can enhance brand reputation, while negative feedback can prompt reconsideration of communication strategies.

6. Discussion

The findings of this study provide a nuanced understanding of how fashion brand identity is constructed, communicated, and interpreted within contemporary media environments. By integrating insights from branding theory, symbolic interactionism, and cultural branding, this discussion explores the broader implications of the findings and situates them within existing literature.

6.1 Brand Identity as a Dynamic and Relational Construct

One of the central insights of this study is that fashion brand identity is not a fixed or static entity but a dynamic and relational construct. While brands attempt to define their identity through strategic communication, the ultimate meaning of the brand emerges through interaction with consumers and media contexts.

Kapferer’s (2012) Brand Identity Prism provides a useful framework for understanding the intended dimensions of brand identity. However, the findings suggest that these dimensions are continuously negotiated and reinterpreted in practice. For example, the “personality” of a brand may be shaped not only by official messaging but also by influencer collaborations and consumer-generated content.

This dynamic perspective aligns with symbolic interactionism, which emphasises the fluid and socially constructed nature of meaning (Blumer, 1969). It also highlights the limitations of viewing brand identity as a purely managerial construct, underscoring the need to consider the role of consumers as active participants in meaning-making.

6.2 The Mediating Role of Digital Media

Digital media platforms play a pivotal role in mediating the relationship between brands and consumers. Unlike traditional media, which primarily functioned as one-way communication channels, digital platforms enable interactive and participatory engagement. This shift has profound implications for how brand identity is constructed and perceived.

The concept of networked narratives (Kozinets et al., 2010) is particularly relevant in this context. Brand stories are no longer authored solely by marketers but are co-created by a diverse range of actors, including influencers, consumers, and online communities. This multiplicity of voices enriches the brand narrative but also introduces complexity and potential inconsistency.

The findings also highlight the importance of visual and multimodal communication in digital branding. Images, videos, captions, and comments all contribute to the construction of brand identity, creating a layered and interactive experience. This multimodality enhances engagement but requires careful coordination to maintain coherence.

6.3 Authenticity, Trust, and Consumer Scepticism

Authenticity emerged as a critical factor influencing consumer perception of brand identity. In an environment characterised by information abundance and heightened consumer awareness, authenticity serves as a key determinant of trust and credibility.

The study’s findings suggest that authenticity is evaluated across multiple dimensions, including visual consistency, narrative coherence, and alignment between values and practices. Brands that successfully integrate these elements are more likely to be perceived as genuine and trustworthy.

However, the rise of performative branding has led to increased consumer scepticism. Consumers are increasingly adept at identifying superficial or opportunistic attempts to align with social issues. This scepticism reflects broader cultural shifts toward critical consumption and ethical awareness (McNeill & Moore, 2015).

From a theoretical perspective, this dynamic underscores the relevance of cultural branding theory, which emphasises the importance of addressing cultural tensions in meaningful and authentic ways (Holt, 2004). Brands must therefore move beyond symbolic gestures and demonstrate substantive commitment to their stated values.

6.4 The Role of Influencers in Identity Construction

Influencers play a dual role in the construction of fashion brand identity. On one hand, they act as amplifiers of brand messages, extending the reach and visibility of campaigns. On the other hand, they serve as interpreters who translate brand identity into personalised and relatable content.

The effectiveness of influencer marketing depends on the perceived congruence between the influencer’s persona and the brand’s identity. This finding is consistent with previous research highlighting the importance of authenticity and trust in influencer-consumer relationships (Djafarova & Rushworth, 2017).

However, the reliance on influencers also introduces challenges. The diversification of brand representation can lead to fragmentation and inconsistency, particularly when multiple influencers convey different interpretations of the brand. Brands must therefore carefully select and manage influencer partnerships to maintain coherence while leveraging diversity.

6.5 Implications for Theory and Practice

The findings of this study have several implications for both academic research and practical application. From a theoretical standpoint, the study contributes to a more integrated understanding of brand identity by combining insights from branding, sociology, and cultural studies. It highlights the importance of considering both the construction and interpretation of brand identity, as well as the mediating role of digital media.

Methodologically, the study demonstrates the value of secondary data analysis in consumer research. By analysing real-world media content, researchers can gain insights into authentic representations and interactions that may not be captured through traditional methods.

From a practical perspective, the findings underscore the importance of consistency, authenticity, and cultural relevance in fashion branding. Brands must adopt a holistic approach to identity construction, ensuring alignment across visual elements, narratives, and values. They must also engage with consumers in meaningful ways, recognising their role as co-creators of brand meaning.

6.6 Limitations and Future Research Directions

While this study provides valuable insights, it is important to acknowledge its limitations. The reliance on secondary data limits direct access to consumer perspectives, which may constrain the depth of interpretation. Future research could incorporate primary data, such as interviews or surveys, to complement the findings.

Additionally, the study focuses on a specific set of brands and media contexts, which may limit generalizability. Comparative studies across different cultural contexts or industry segments could provide further insights into the dynamics of brand identity.

Finally, the rapidly evolving nature of digital media presents both challenges and opportunities for future research. Emerging technologies, such as virtual reality and artificial intelligence, are likely to reshape the landscape of fashion branding, warranting ongoing investigation.

7. Conclusion

This study set out to explore consumer perceptions of fashion brand identity through the lens of secondary media analysis, with a particular focus on how identity is constructed, communicated, and interpreted within contemporary digital environments. The findings demonstrate that fashion brand identity is not a static or firm-controlled construct but a dynamic and relational phenomenon shaped by continuous interactions between brands, media platforms, and consumers.

A key conclusion of this research is that visual symbolism and narrative coherence play a central role in establishing and reinforcing brand identity. Consistent aesthetic elements and compelling storytelling enable brands to communicate their values and positioning effectively. However, the interpretation of these elements ultimately depends on consumers, who actively engage with and reinterpret brand messages based on their own social and cultural contexts. This reinforces the relevance of symbolic interactionism in understanding consumer behaviour, as meaning is co-created rather than passively received.

The study also highlights the transformative role of digital media in reshaping branding practices. Social media platforms have enabled a shift from one-way communication to participatory engagement, where consumers contribute to the construction of brand identity through user-generated content and online interactions. Influencers further mediate this process by translating brand messages into personalised narratives, although their effectiveness depends heavily on perceived authenticity and alignment with brand values.

Another important finding is the growing significance of cultural alignment in shaping consumer perceptions. Brands that engage meaningfully with contemporary social issues, such as sustainability and inclusivity, are more likely to resonate with consumers. However, the rise of consumer scepticism underscores the importance of authenticity and transparency. Superficial or inconsistent branding efforts can undermine trust and damage brand credibility.

From a theoretical perspective, this study contributes to the literature by integrating branding theory with sociological and cultural approaches, offering a more holistic understanding of brand identity. Methodologically, it demonstrates the value of secondary data analysis in capturing real-world representations of branding practices.

In conclusion, fashion brands must navigate an increasingly complex and participatory media landscape by adopting strategies that prioritise consistency, authenticity, and cultural relevance. Future research could build on these findings by incorporating primary data or exploring cross-cultural variations in brand perception, further enriching our understanding of consumer-brand relationships in the digital age.

References

Aaker, D. A. (1996). Building strong brands. Free Press.

Arvidsson, A. (2006). Brands: Meaning and value in media culture. Routledge.

Barnes, L., & Lea-Greenwood, G. (2010). Fast fashion in the retail store environment. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 38(10), 760–772. https://doi.org/10.1108/09590551011076533

Belk, R. W. (1988). Possessions and the extended self in consumer behaviour. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(2), 139–168. https://doi.org/10.1086/209154

Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. University of California Press.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2018). The Sage handbook of qualitative research (5th ed.). Sage Publications.

Djafarova, E., & Rushworth, C. (2017). Exploring the credibility of online celebrities on social media. Computers in Human Behaviour, 68, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.11.009

Escalas, J. E., & Bettman, J. R. (2005). Self-construal, reference groups, and brand meaning. Journal of Consumer Research, 32(3), 378–389. https://doi.org/10.1086/497549

Heaton, J. (2004). Reworking qualitative data. Sage Publications.

Holt, D. B. (2004). How brands become icons: The principles of cultural branding. Harvard Business School Press.

Johnston, J. (2018). Media analysis and consumer culture. Journal of Cultural Studies, 12(3), 45–62.

Kapferer, J.-N. (2012). The new strategic brand management: Advanced insights and strategic thinking (5th ed.). Kogan Page.

Kozinets, R. V., de Valck, K., Wojnicki, A. C., & Wilner, S. J. (2010). Networked narratives: Understanding word-of-mouth marketing in online communities. Journal of Marketing, 74(2), 71–89. https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.74.2.71

Mannan, K.A., & Farhana, K.M. (2026). The Principles of Qur’anic Research Methodology: Deriving the Process of Knowledge from Revelation. KMF Publishers. Open Access (CC BY 4.0). DOI: https://doi.org/10.64907/xkmf.book.pqrm.26.02.12

McNeill, L., & Moore, R. (2015). Sustainable fashion consumption and the fast fashion conundrum. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 39(3), 212–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12169

Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

Solomon, M. R. (2018). Consumer behaviour: Buying, having, and being (12th ed.). Pearson.