Journal Home Page
OPEN ACCESS
Time, Discipline, and Performance Management in Professional Dance Training
| Afrina Afroze Chowdhury Assistant Professor Department of Dance Faculty of Fine & Performing Arts Shanto-Mariam University of Creative Technology Dhaka, Bangladesh Email: afrina.chow@gmail.com ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0003-7386-0204 |
| Aradhona Roy Department of Music Faculty of Fine & Performing Arts Shanto-Mariam University of Creative Technology Dhaka, Bangladesh ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0001-2924-5808 |
| Md. Tamim Iqbal Department of Graphic Design & Multimedia Faculty of Fine & Performing Arts Shanto-Mariam University of Creative Technology Dhaka, Bangladesh Email: tamimdh10@gmail.com ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0003-7899-974X |
| Prof. Dr Kazi Abdul Mannan Department of Business Administration Faculty of Business Shanto-Mariam University of Creative Technology Dhaka, Bangladesh Email: drkaziabdulmannan@gmail.com ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7123-132X |
Corresponding author: Afrina Afroze Chowdhury: afrina.chow@gmail.com
Tour. herit. cult. stud. 2026, 6(1); https://doi.org/10.64907/xkmf.v6i1.thcs.3
Submission received: 1 November 2025 / Revised: 9 December 2025 / Accepted: 21 December 2025 / Published: 1 January 2026
Abstract
Professional dance training is an intensive constellation of temporal demands, disciplinary practices, and performance-oriented management that together shape the development of technical skill, artistic identity, and career trajectories. This paper examines how time (scheduling, temporal rhythms, and time-use), discipline (bodily regimes, institutional norms, self-discipline), and performance management (feedback systems, goal setting, assessment) interrelate in professional dance contexts. Drawing on literature from expertise research, self-determination and self-regulation, sociological theories of discipline and habitus, and dance pedagogy, we develop a theoretical framework that situates dance training at the intersection of embodied practice, institutional regulation, and motivational dynamics. We then present a qualitative study based on semi-structured interviews (n = 24) with dancers, artistic directors, and teachers, together with participant observation across three professional training programs. Thematic analysis identified four central themes: temporal structuring and temporal scarcity; disciplinary practices (external and internalised); performance-management strategies (goal setting, feedback loops); and identity work and resilience. Findings highlight tensions between institutional scheduling pressures and the embodied temporality of skill acquisition, the simultaneous benefits and harms of rigorous disciplinary regimes, and the centrality of adaptive performance-management practices for sustained career development. Practical implications concern program design (balanced scheduling, reflective practice), pedagogical approaches (autonomy-supportive feedback), and policy (health-centred training standards). Limitations and directions for future research are discussed.
Keywords: professional dance training; time management; discipline; performance management; deliberate practice; qualitative study
1. Introduction
Professional dance training occupies a unique position in the performing arts: it demands exceptional levels of bodily precision, long-term commitment, and continual adaptation to changing choreographic and career requirements. Unlike many cognitive or sedentary pursuits, dance learning is fundamentally temporal and embodied – skills are accumulated through hours of sustained, structured practice; progress is measured through performative outputs; and both institutions and individuals deploy disciplinary practices to regulate bodies and time. Understanding how time, discipline, and performance management interact in professional dance training is, therefore, essential for educators, administrators, and dancers themselves.
This study asks:
- How do professional training environments structure and experience time?
- What forms of discipline – institutional, pedagogical, and self-directed – operate within these environments?
- How are performance-management practices (e.g., feedback, goal setting, assessment) organised and perceived, and what effects do they have on development and wellbeing?
To address these questions, I combine theory from expertise research and motivational psychology with sociological perspectives on discipline and embodied practice, then present qualitative empirical work that examines lived experiences in professional training contexts.
The paper proceeds as follows. Section 2 reviews interdisciplinary literature on time, discipline, and performance in training contexts with attention to dance-specific scholarship. Section 3 presents the theoretical framework linking deliberate practice, self-determination/self-regulation, and Foucauldian/Bourdieusian accounts of discipline and habitus. Section 4 describes the qualitative methodology. Sections 5 and 6 present findings and discuss implications. Section 7 concludes with recommendations for pedagogy, program design, and future research.
2. Literature review
2.1 Time and temporal organisation in skilled practice
Time is a central resource in skill acquisition. Research on expertise consistently demonstrates that extensive, structured practice – often operationalised as many hours of deliberate practice – predicts high-level performance across domains (Ericsson & Tesch-Römer, 1993). Deliberate practice emphasises quality, focused activities that target weaknesses, immediate feedback, and repetition. In dance, “time on task” combines studio hours, rehearsals, cross-training, and recovery; however, the temporal distribution (spacing, intensity, variation) of practice influences learning, injury rates, and retention (Ericsson et al., 1993; Sennett, 2008).
Temporal rhythms in dance are not merely quantitative. Embodied temporalities – e.g., kinesthetic timing, proprioceptive rhythms, and the tacit timing of ensemble work – are integral to artistry (Csikszentmihalyi, 1990). The scheduling cultures of training institutions (daily class, rehearsal blocks, audition season) create institutional temporalities that can either facilitate or constrain the embodied processes of learning (Hargreaves & Miell, 1998).
2.2 Discipline: bodies, institutions, and internalisation
Discipline in dance operates at multiple levels. Foucault (1977) described disciplinary power as practices that train bodies to be useful and docile; in dance studios, hierarchies, and codified techniques exert similar regulatory pressures. Bourdieu’s (1977) concept of habitus helps explain how dispositions and bodily habits are inculcated through long-term exposure to training regimes and social expectations.
At the pedagogical level, discipline includes technical drills, alignment norms, rehearsal etiquette, and health protocols. While such practices can be enabling – fostering precision and reliability – they also risk producing rigidity, overuse injuries, and psychological stress when applied without regard to individual autonomy and wellbeing (Sennett, 2008; Csikszentmihalyi, 1990).
2.3 Performance management: goals, feedback, and assessment
Performance management frameworks derived from organisational studies (goal-setting, feedback loops, appraisal systems) have analogues in dance training. Effective goal-setting (specific, challenging, and proximal) and timely, constructive feedback support learning (Locke & Latham, 2002; Zimmerman, 2000). In the dance context, feedback comes from teachers, choreographers, peers, and self-reflection (video review, journaling). How feedback is delivered – whether controlling or autonomy-supportive – matters for motivation and persistence (Deci & Ryan, 2000).
Assessment practices in dance are complex because artistic quality is partly subjective and culturally embedded. Assessment systems (gradings, auditions, adjudications) shape training priorities, sometimes privileging virtuosity or conformity over creativity and health (Risner, 2007). Performance management also includes career management – audition preparation, repertoire planning, and injury management – all of which require time and disciplined coordination.
2.4 Wellbeing, resilience, and negotiated norms
Recent literature emphasises dancer wellbeing and the need to reconcile high-performance demands with health (Wanke & Huxley, 2019; Koutedakis & Sharp, 2004). Resilience – both physical and psychological – emerges from adaptive regulation of time, restorative practices, social support, and reflective pedagogy. Autonomy-supportive environments, according to self-determination theory, foster intrinsic motivation and greater persistence (Deci & Ryan, 2000).
3. Theoretical framework
To analyse the interplay of time, discipline, and performance management, this study synthesises three complementary theoretical lenses: deliberate practice/expertise theory, self-determination/self-regulation perspectives, and sociological theories of discipline and habitus. Each contributes distinct but integrative insights.
3.1 Deliberate practice and embodied expertise
Ericsson et al.’s (1993) deliberate practice model provides a cognitive-behavioural account of how structured, goal-directed practice leads to expertise. Key elements – focused tasks, immediate feedback, repetition, and progressive difficulty – translate clearly into dance pedagogy (technique classes, corrections, run-throughs). Deliberate practice foregrounds the role of temporal investment: cumulative hours, distribution of practice sessions, and the quality of each session. Applied to dance, the model accounts for why long-term, intensely scheduled training is normative in professional development.
However, deliberate practice alone is insufficient to address the embodied, social, and institutional dimensions of dance. Bodies fatigue, injury disrupts practice, and institutional norms mediate what is practised and how. Thus, we integrate motivational and sociological perspectives.
3.2 Self-determination and self-regulation
Self-determination theory (Deci & Ryan, 2000) emphasises basic psychological needs – autonomy, competence, and relatedness – as drivers of intrinsic motivation. Dance training that supports autonomy (e.g., collaborative goal-setting, choice within constraints), competence (clear feedback), and relatedness (supportive peers/teachers) is more likely to sustain motivation and healthy engagement.
Complementary to SDT, self-regulated learning models (Zimmerman, 2000) explain how learners plan, monitor, and reflect on practice. Self-regulation is crucial in contexts with heavy temporal demands: dancers must plan rehearsal schedules, monitor fatigue, and regulate practice quality. Performance management practices (goal setting, feedback systems, reflective tools) function to scaffold self-regulation.
3.3 Discipline, habitus, and power
Foucault’s (1977) account of disciplinary power and Bourdieu’s (1977) habitus offer sociological depth: they highlight how institutions shape bodily dispositions and how power circulates through pedagogical rituals. Discipline in dance is not merely individual willpower but a historically informed set of techniques (posture, alignment, etiquette) transmitted via pedagogy. Habitus explains why certain movements feel ‘natural’ to dancers socialised in particular styles. Importantly, these frameworks signal potential harms: normalisation of pain, exclusionary aesthetic standards, and reproduction of hierarchies.
3.4 Integrative model
Figure 1 (conceptual) synthesises the three lenses: institutional temporal structures and scheduling shape opportunities for deliberate practice; these interact with disciplinary practices (external rules, embodied dispositions) that are internalised into habitus; performance-management mechanisms (goal setting, feedback) scaffold self-regulation and motivation. Outcomes (technical skill, artistic development, and well-being) emerge from dynamic interactions among these elements, mediated by individual differences and institutional cultures.
Figure 1: Conceptual Model showing the relationship between Time, Discipline, and Performance Management in professional dance training
Figure 1 presents a conceptual framework that illustrates the interdependent relationship between time, discipline, and performance management in professional dance training. The overlapping circles indicate that none of these dimensions operates in isolation; rather, they intersect to produce outcomes such as technical skill, motivation, and well-being.
The time domain emphasises scheduling, structured practice, and embodied rhythms necessary for skill acquisition, echoing Ericsson et al.’s (1993) theory of deliberate practice, which stresses the critical role of structured hours. Discipline reflects both external regulation (rules, attendance, technique enforcement) and internalised bodily dispositions or habitus (Bourdieu, 1977). This disciplinary dimension supports consistency but can also impose restrictive norms, aligning with Foucault’s (1977) analysis of how institutions regulate bodies. Performance management represents the goal-setting, feedback, and assessment processes that scaffold self-regulation and sustain motivation (Locke & Latham, 2002; Deci & Ryan, 2000).
The intersection of these three domains highlights that outcomes are not solely the result of practice time but of a balance among temporal rhythms, disciplinary practices, and supportive feedback systems. When integrated effectively, they promote resilience, artistry, and well-being (Koutedakis & Sharp, 2004). Conversely, an imbalance risks injury, burnout, or demotivation. Thus, the framework underscores the need for holistic, health-centred approaches to professional dance training.
4. Research methodology
4.1 Research design
Given the study’s exploratory aims and interest in lived experience, a qualitative design was chosen to capture the complexity of time, discipline, and performance management in situ (Creswell, 2013; Patton, 2002). The study combined semi-structured interviews with participant observation and document review to triangulate perspectives.
4.2 Participants and setting
Participants were purposively sampled from three professional training programs in urban centres (contemporary and classical ballet emphases). Sampling aimed for diversity across role (students in final professional years, recent graduates, teachers, artistic directors), gender, and training style.
- Total participants: 24 (14 dancers – 8 students, 6 recent graduates; 6 teachers; 4 artistic directors/administrators).
- Age range (dancers): 18–28 years.
- Programs: Program A (classical ballet conservatory), Program B (contemporary company-affiliated school), Program C (mixed-methods professional school).
- Ethical approval: Participants provided informed consent; pseudonyms are used.
4.3 Data collection
Data sources:
Semi-structured interviews (45–90 minutes each): Topic guide covered training schedules, daily time use, experiences of discipline, feedback practices, injury and recovery, career planning, and perceptions of assessment. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim.
Participant observation: The researcher conducted 60 hours of observation across daily classes, rehearsals, and board meetings (20 hours per program). Field notes documented scheduling practices, teacher-student interactions, feedback moments, and embodied routines.
Document review: Program schedules, assessment rubrics, syllabi, and health protocols were collected where available.
4.4 Data analysis
Thematic analysis followed Braun and Clarke’s (2006) six-step approach: familiarisation, initial coding, theme development, reviewing themes, defining/naming themes, and producing the report. NVivo software aided organisation (codes and memos). Coding prioritised semantic and latent features relating to time use, discipline, feedback, and identity.
To ensure credibility, I used triangulation (interviews, observation, documents), member checking with a subset of participants (n = 8), and maintained an audit trail. Reflexivity was practised through researcher memos reflecting on positionality as a researcher with prior dance training.
4.5 Trustworthiness and limitations
Trustworthiness considerations included credibility (triangulation, member checking), transferability (thick description of contexts), dependability (audit trail), and confirmability (reflexive notes) following Lincoln and Guba (1985). Limitations include purposive sampling in urban professional programs (limits generalizability), potential social desirability in interviews (mitigated via rapport building), and the researcher’s insider status, which may have influenced observations.
5. Findings
Analysis produced four major themes: Temporal structuring and temporal scarcity; Disciplinary practices and embodied regimes; Performance-management strategies as adaptive systems; and Identity work, resilience, and wellbeing. Each theme is developed with illustrative quotes and observational vignettes.
5.1 Temporal structuring and temporal scarcity
Participants uniformly described time as a scarce and highly structured resource. Daily schedules were dense: morning technique class (90 minutes), supplementary conditioning, rehearsals (2–4 hours), cross-training, academic or vocational classes, and evening recovery. One student described a typical day:
“We’re in at 9 for barre, then rehearsals until 5 with a break for physio once a week – time is everything; there’s always another thing to fit” (Aisha, student, Program A).
Two sub-themes emerged:
a. Quantity vs. quality tensions. Many dancers equated more hours with progress, but also recognised diminishing returns when sessions were unfocused or fatigue was high. Teachers commented on the challenge of scheduling quality rehearsal windows amidst institutional demands:
“You can’t just add hours; you have to schedule smart – focused repetitions, rather than endless runs” (Marco, teacher, Program B).
b. Temporal rhythms and embodied timing. Observation revealed that embodied learning often required distributed practice and rest: micro-recovery between runs, somatic breaks, and reflective cooldowns. However, institutional schedules sometimes compressed these rhythms, privileging show-readiness over consolidation. A recent graduate recounted:
“We learned choreography in three days for the gala; we looked professional on opening night, but a lot of things didn’t stick” (Lena, graduate, Program C).
5.2 Disciplinary practices and embodied regimes
Discipline manifested through formal rules (attendance policies, uniform codes), pedagogical drills (pliés, allegro sequences), and social norms (deference to senior company members). Observations illustrated ritualised sequences: barre as ritual, specific warm-up progressions, and standardised correction language.
a. External disciplinary structures. Artistic directors described strict attendance and conditioning policies designed to ensure readiness:
“Consistency is non-negotiable; if someone misses class, they don’t get cast” (Director James, Program A).
Such rules enforced collective norms but also created fear: dancers described anxiety about reporting minor illnesses.
b. Internalised discipline and self-regulation. Several participants described self-discipline as an internalised habitus: early rising, regimented nutrition, and micro-practices (video review, imagery). One teacher observed:
“The best students self-police – they come early, do extra reps, they’ve learned how to live the life” (Sofia, Program B).
c. Costs of disciplinary intensity. Many participants reported trade-offs: overuse injuries, emotional burnout, and restricted explorations of creative risk. A dancer said,
“The discipline helps you be reliable, but sometimes it turns the body into a tool you forget to listen to” (Noah, student, Program C).
5.3 Performance-management strategies as adaptive systems
Performance management in these programs combined formal assessment (end-of-term exams, graded classes), informal feedback (corrections, rehearsal notes), and self-directed goal setting.
a. Goal setting and progress monitoring. Dancers used proximal goals (clean a phrase, improve turnout) and longer-term career goals (company placement). Teachers emphasised SMART goals in coaching:
“We break down the variation into parts, set measurable targets for each week” (Marco). Self-monitoring included video analysis and practice logs.
b. Feedback practices: form and function. Feedback varied from controlling (directive corrections, public critique) to autonomy-supportive (dialogue, positive reinforcement). Participants preferred feedback that combined specificity with encouragement:
“Just telling me ‘do more extension’ isn’t enough; I want to know how and why” (Aisha).
Observations showed that choreography rehearsals often entailed rapid, corrective feedback, while masterclasses favoured dialogic exchanges.
c. Institutional appraisal and audition cultures. Assessment procedures could be high-stakes (auditions, end-of-year exams) that shaped trainers’ priorities: risk-averse programming, emphasis on technical proficiency. Artistic directors acknowledged tension:
“We must produce dancers who are audition-ready, but also artists; the systems don’t always support both” (James).
5.4 Identity work, resilience, and well-being
Training was a site of identity formation: dancers narrated becoming “professional” as an identity inscribed through time and discipline. Resilience emerged as a negotiated skill set: physical conditioning, psychological strategies (mindfulness, cognitive reframing), and social supports.
a. Narrative of becoming. Many participants framed training as a rite of passage:
“You learn to think like a dancer” (Lena).
Habitus-like dispositions – punctuality, deference to rehearsal hierarchy – were internalised.
b. Coping strategies and support systems. Participants highlighted the importance of support – mentorship, physiotherapy, peer groups – to counterbalance disciplinary pressures. Programs with embedded health supports produced more adaptive outcomes. Teachers who framed feedback within developmental trajectories fostered more sustainable engagement.
c. Strain and exclusion. Some dancers, especially those with non-conforming bodies or socioeconomic constraints (e.g., needing paid work), felt marginalised by rigid schedules and aesthetic norms. These factors shaped attrition and unequal access to professional pathways.
6. Discussion
The findings offer an integrated view of how temporal structures, disciplinary practices, and performance-management systems jointly shape professional dance training. Below, I link empirical observations to the theoretical framework and broader literature.
6.1 Temporal management: beyond hours to rhythms
Consistent with deliberate practice theory (Ericsson et al., 1993), participants emphasised time-on-task; however, quality and distribution were equally salient. The tension between quantity and quality aligns with research indicating that overemphasis on cumulative hours without attention to recovery and focused tasks can impede learning and increase injury risk (Koutedakis & Sharp, 2004). Moreover, the embodied temporalities observed-micro-recovery, kinesthetic consolidation-suggest that scheduling practices must respect embodied rhythms. This supports calls to design training schedules that incorporate distributed practice, variable intensity, and restorative time (Csikszentmihalyi, 1990).
6.2 Discipline as enabling and constraining
Foucauldian and Bourdieuian lenses illuminated how discipline is both formative and normative. Institutional rules ensured reliability and facilitated ensemble work, consistent with Sennett’s (2008) account of craft formation – disciplined repetition yields mastery. Yet the data also revealed costs: normalisation of pain, restricted autonomy, and exclusionary aesthetic standards. These ambivalences echo critical dance scholarship that warns against uncritical valorisation of discipline (Risner, 2007). The key is calibrating discipline to support both technical skill and embodied agency, attending to individual variability and well-being.
6.3 Performance management: scaffolding self-regulation and motivation
Performance-management practices that combined clear, proximal goals with autonomy-supportive feedback aligned with SDT (Deci & Ryan, 2000) and self-regulation models (Zimmerman, 2000) produced stronger motivation and adaptive practice behaviours. Conversely, controlling feedback undermined intrinsic motivation and sometimes triggered defensive responses. The pedagogical implication is to embed formative, dialogic feedback practices that scaffold self-regulation-e.g., co-constructed goals, video-based reflection, and structured practice logs.
6.4 Identity, resilience, and equity
Training environments inculcated professional identities (habitus), yet access to the routines that produce that habitus was uneven. Time poverty (need for paid work), body-type exclusions, and cultural capital constraints produced differential outcomes. This supports sociological critiques of training pathways as reproducing inequality (Bourdieu, 1977). Programs that provided health supports, flexible scheduling, and mentorship enhanced resilience and reduced attrition.
6.5 Practical integration: towards health-centred performance cultures
Findings suggest several integrative recommendations:
- Schedule design: Prioritise distributed practice blocks, protected recovery time, and integrated conditioning rather than sheer volume of hours.
- Feedback culture: Train teachers in autonomy-supportive feedback methods; encourage dialogue and the use of objective tools (video review, rubrics).
- Assessment reform: Balance technical appraisal with measures of adaptability, creativity, and health indicators.
- Health integration: Embed physiotherapy, psychological support, and nutrition services within training programs.
- Equity measures: Offer stipends, flexible scheduling, and outreach to diversify pathways.
7. Conclusion and recommendations
This study examined how time, discipline, and performance management operate in professional dance training. The mixed theoretical lens revealed that while disciplined, time-intensive practice is essential for technical mastery, the manner in which time is organised and discipline is enacted critically mediates outcomes for skill development, motivation, and wellbeing. Performance-management strategies that scaffold self-regulation and support autonomy foster sustainable development, whereas rigid, high-stakes regimes may produce short-term performance gains at the cost of long-term health and equity.
Recommendations for practice and policy include adopting scheduling practices informed by distributed practice principles; cultivating autonomy-supportive feedback cultures; integrating health services and resilience training into curricula; and designing assessment systems that value broader competencies beyond technical virtuosity. Administrators should also attend to access barriers that render temporal and disciplinary demands exclusionary.
7.1 Limitations and future research
Limitations include purposive sampling within three urban programs, which may not represent rural or community-based training. Future research could employ longitudinal designs to track trajectories across early career stages, experimental interventions (e.g., schedule re-design), and quantitative measures linking time-use patterns to injury and retention. Comparative studies across dance styles and cultural contexts would deepen understanding of how habitus and institution interact.
In sum, optimising professional dance training requires attending not only to hours of practice but to the rhythms of the body, the ethics of discipline, and the architecture of performance management. Reimagining these elements with dancer wellbeing and artistic growth as central goals promises more sustainable pathways to excellence.
References
Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge University Press.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. Harper & Row.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behaviour. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R. T., & Tesch-Römer, C. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100(3), 363–406. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.100.3.363
Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison (A. Sheridan, Trans.). Pantheon Books.
Hargreaves, D., & Miell, D. (1998). The contexts of creativity in music. In Handbook of Music Psychology (pp. 145–160). Academic Press.
Koutedakis, Y., & Sharp, N. C. C. (2004). The fit and healthy dancer. Journal of Dance Medicine & Science, 8(3), 53–55.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. SAGE Publications.
Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey. American Psychologist, 57(9), 705–717. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.57.9.705
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Risner, D. (2007). Dance education policy and equity issues. In The Oxford Handbook of Dance and Politics (pp. 213–234). Oxford University Press. (Note: See contemporary dance education policy literature for expanded discussion.)
Sennett, R. (2008). The Craftsman. Yale University Press.
Wanke, E., & Huxley, A. (2019). Health and Well-being in dance training: Principles and practices. International Journal of Dance Therapy, 21(2), 123–140.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of Self-Regulation (pp. 13–39). Academic Press.