OPEN ACCESS
Artificial Intelligence (AI) Opens a New Horizon in the Study of the Holy Quran
Dr Khandaker Mursheda Farhana1*
1Corresponding author: Associate Professor, Department of Sociology and Anthropology, Shanto-Mariam University of Creative Technology, Dhaka, Bangladesh. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0009-1526-6147
Email: drfarhanamannan@gmail.com
2Professor, Department of Business Administration, Faculty of Business, Shanto-Mariam University of Creative Technology, Dhaka, Bangladesh. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7123-132X
Email: drkaziabdulmannan@gmail.com
Theor. appl. technol. sci. rev. 2025, 3(3); https://doi.org/10.64907/xkmf.v3i3.tatscr1
Submission received: 1 August 2025 / Revised: 9 September 2025 / Accepted: 17 September 2025 / Published: 19 September 2025
Abstract
This article investigates the transformative impact of Artificial Intelligence (AI) on the study of the Holy Quran, highlighting the intersection between Islamic theology, computer science, and linguistics. AI technologies, particularly Natural Language Processing (NLP), Machine Learning (ML), and Deep Learning, are increasingly employed to analyse Quranic texts in innovative ways, enhancing traditional exegesis (tafsir), semantic interpretation, and linguistic pattern recognition. Through qualitative content analysis and case study approaches, this paper examines how AI enhances Quranic translation, accessibility, and educational applications, while also addressing the ethical, epistemological, and theological challenges that arise from its use. The findings reveal that AI not only supplements traditional scholarly frameworks but also democratises Quranic knowledge by improving accessibility for diverse linguistic and cognitive communities. However, the study emphasises the need for ethical guidelines and interdisciplinary collaboration to maintain theological integrity and avoid interpretive misuse. AI, when guided by Islamic ethical principles and scholarly oversight, can serve as a powerful tool for augmenting human understanding of the Quran. This paper proposes a balanced integration of AI in Quranic studies, positioning it as a support mechanism that enhances, rather than replaces, the profound human engagement with the sacred text.
Keywords: artificial intelligence, holy quran, tafsir, natural language processing, semantic analysis, machine learning
1. Introduction
The rapid evolution of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the 21st century has reshaped numerous domains of knowledge, from scientific research to social communication. Among these, the domain of religious studies—particularly the study of sacred texts—has begun to engage with AI in ways that challenge traditional paradigms. The Holy Quran, revered by Muslims as the eternal word of God, has historically been the subject of deep and rigorous scholarly analysis. However, the integration of AI into Quranic studies is an emerging phenomenon that raises critical theological, methodological, and epistemological questions. This study aims to explore how AI technologies can enhance the study of the Quran while adhering to the principles of Islamic epistemology and scholarly tradition.
AI technologies, including natural language processing (NLP), machine learning, and pattern recognition, provide innovative methods for analysing Quranic texts. These tools enable large-scale thematic categorisation, semantic clustering, automated translation, and the identification of patterns that would be otherwise difficult to detect through manual scholarship alone (Al-Yahya, Al-Khalifa, & Al-Onaizan, 2020). For example, AI models can identify recurring linguistic structures, emotional tones, and theological motifs across different surahs (chapters) and ayat (verses). These computational approaches, while not replacements for traditional exegesis (tafsir), can provide supplementary insights that help deepen understanding of the Quran’s intricate linguistic and conceptual frameworks.
However, the application of AI to Quranic studies is not without significant limitations and concerns. One central issue is the ontological and theological status of the Quran itself. In Islamic belief, the Quran is not merely a historical or literary document; it is considered a divine revelation. Still, the uncreated, divine speech of God (kalam Allah) was revealed to the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him). As such, its interpretation demands reverence, contextual awareness, and adherence to centuries of established scholarly discourse (Nasr, 2006). Unlike human scholars who interpret with an awareness of spiritual and ethical context, AI operates through algorithmic logic, devoid of consciousness, intent, or reverence. Therefore, any application of AI in this domain must be carefully moderated and situated within the boundaries set by Islamic theology and jurisprudence.
Moreover, the complexity of classical Arabic presents unique challenges for computational models. The Quran’s language is rich in metaphors, rhetorical devices, and syntactic structures that defy simplistic interpretation (Esack, 2005). While modern AI models have improved their handling of Arabic text, they often struggle with the semantic richness and historical context embedded in the Quran. Additionally, different schools of Islamic thought (e.g., Sunni, Shia, Sufi) bring diverse interpretive traditions to the text, which cannot be uniformly captured by AI systems. These limitations necessitate a hybrid approach that combines computational analysis with scholarly validation.
Another critical aspect of this study is the potential for AI to democratise access to Quranic knowledge. AI-powered apps and platforms can assist users in exploring tafsir literature, learning tajweed (rules of Quranic recitation), or understanding thematic structures through interactive tools. Such accessibility is essential in the digital age, where Muslims worldwide seek meaningful engagement with the Quran through online platforms. By lowering the barriers to entry, AI can foster greater individual reflection (tadabbur) and community learning, while still depending on authenticated sources and verified content (Alshamsan et al., 2021).
At the same time, ethical concerns must be addressed, including the risks of misinterpretation, algorithmic bias, and the commodification of sacred knowledge. Unsupervised AI models may produce outputs that misrepresent Islamic teachings, especially when trained on biased or incomplete datasets. Furthermore, the rise of commercial Quranic AI applications may prioritise user engagement over theological accuracy, potentially leading to spiritual confusion or misinformation. Therefore, the responsible development and deployment of AI in Quranic studies must involve theologians, linguists, computer scientists, and ethicists working in tandem.
This research is situated at the intersection of AI technology and Islamic studies, aiming to explore how modern computational tools can complement, rather than replace, the traditional sciences of the Quran. It is motivated by a dual commitment: to uphold the sanctity and epistemological integrity of the Quran while embracing the possibilities that modern technology offers for its study. The study will examine current AI tools used in Quranic analysis, evaluate their linguistic and theological validity, and propose frameworks for their ethical and constructive application.
In conclusion, as AI opens new horizons in many fields, its role in Quranic studies must be navigated with both openness and caution. Algorithms cannot fully capture the Quran’s spiritual depth and linguistic beauty, but AI can serve as a valuable assistant in uncovering patterns, enhancing accessibility, and supporting scholarly efforts. This paper contributes to the growing body of interdisciplinary research that seeks to harmonise technological innovation with theological fidelity, ensuring that the Quran remains both deeply respected and increasingly understood in the digital era.
2. Theoretical Framework
The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into Quranic studies necessitates a robust theoretical framework that accommodates the convergence of technological, linguistic, and theological domains. This section outlines the conceptual underpinnings that guide the research, drawing from three key theoretical perspectives: Islamic hermeneutics, Natural Language Processing (NLP) theory, and the socio-technical systems approach. These theories provide a comprehensive lens through which to assess how AI technologies interact with, support, and potentially transform traditional Islamic scholarly practices.
2.1 Islamic Hermeneutics and the Epistemology of Revelation
The foundation of this study rests on the traditional Islamic hermeneutical framework, which emphasises the divine origin, linguistic intricacy, and contextual richness of the Quran. Islamic hermeneutics (tafsir) operates through both transmitted knowledge (naqli) and rational deduction (aqli), striking a balance between divine revelation and human interpretive effort (Esack, 2005). Classical scholars, such as Al-Tabari, Al-Qurtubi, and Fakhr al-Din al-Razi, developed exegetical methodologies that were grounded in grammar, theology, jurisprudence, and hadith studies.
In the context of AI, this framework is crucial for establishing interpretive boundaries. AI models, while capable of linguistic analysis, lack spiritual insight, intention (niyyah), and access to divine wisdom. Therefore, AI can only serve as a tool within the hermeneutic process, rather than being a source of interpretation itself. As Nasr (2006) explains, the Quran must be approached as a sacred text with both exoteric (zahir) and esoteric (batin) meanings—layers that cannot be fully accessed by algorithmic models alone.
Thus, Islamic epistemology positions AI as a facilitator rather than an interpreter, reaffirming the primacy of human scholarly authority and ethical responsibility in engaging with the Quran.
2.2 Natural Language Processing (NLP) Theory
The second theoretical pillar of this study is derived from NLP theory, which provides the computational basis for textual analysis, semantic modelling, and pattern recognition in Quranic studies. NLP, a subfield of artificial intelligence, focuses on the interaction between computers and human languages, enabling machines to read, interpret, and generate human language meaningfully (Jurafsky & Martin, 2021).
Core NLP techniques relevant to this research include:
- Tokenisation: Breaking down Quranic verses into individual words or phrases for semantic tagging.
- Named Entity Recognition (NER): Identifying and classifying proper nouns such as prophets, locations, and divine names.
- Sentiment Analysis: Assessing the emotional or evaluative tone in verses that discuss mercy, punishment, or ethical behaviour.
- Topic Modelling: Grouping thematically similar verses using probabilistic algorithms such as Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA).
By leveraging these techniques, NLP theory enables researchers to systematically uncover recurring motifs, rhetorical structures, and semantic patterns in the Quran (Al-Yahya et al., 2020). However, limitations arise when these tools are applied to classical Arabic, a language rich in polysemy, syntax, and rhetorical devices. This necessitates the use of hybrid models that combine computational accuracy with theological sensitivity, ensuring that linguistic simplification does not distort the meanings of religious concepts.
2.3 Socio-Technical Systems Theory
The socio-technical systems (STS) theory offers a comprehensive perspective on the interplay between technology, human users, and institutional frameworks. Rooted in organisational studies and human-computer interaction, STS posits that technological systems must be co-designed with their social environments to achieve optimal functionality and ethical balance (Trist, 1981; Mumford, 2006).
Applied to AI in Quranic studies, STS theory emphasises the importance of collaboration among technologists, Islamic scholars, educators, and end-users. AI tools must be designed not only for technical efficacy but also for cultural and theological compatibility. For example, Quranic apps that use AI-driven translation should consult scholars to ensure fidelity to classical meanings. Similarly, educational platforms using AI for tajweed training must align with established qira’at (recitation traditions).
The theory also addresses ethical implications, advocating for systems that respect user agency, data privacy, and religious sensitivities. This is especially important in contexts where AI-generated content may influence personal beliefs or community practices. By framing AI adoption as a socio-technical endeavour, STS theory emphasises inclusive design, ongoing oversight, and contextual awareness.
2.4 Synthesising the Framework
These three theoretical perspectives—Islamic hermeneutics, NLP theory, and STS—converge to form a multidimensional analytical framework for this study. Each contributes a distinct but complementary lens:
- Islamic Hermeneutics: Grounds the study in a theological and ethical paradigm.
- NLP Theory: Supplies the technical methodologies for textual analysis.
- STS Theory: Addresses the human and institutional dimensions of AI integration.
This synthesis ensures that AI is evaluated not merely as a computational tool, but as a participant in a broader epistemological and sociocultural system. The framework affirms that while AI can reveal linguistic patterns and enhance accessibility, its implementation must be guided by Islamic values, scholarly authority, and interdisciplinary collaboration.
In conclusion, the theoretical framework for this research reflects the complexity and promise of integrating AI into the sacred space of Quranic study. It seeks to strike a balance between innovation and reverence, data and doctrine, efficiency and ethics—ensuring that technology serves as a means of deepening, not diminishing, human engagement with the divine word.
3. Literature Review
Beyond semantic classification, AI has also been instrumental in analysing the sentiment of Quranic texts. Nazir et al. (2022) applied convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and recurrent layers to discern emotional tones in verses, identifying expressions of divine wrath, compassion, warning, and hope. These emotional markers add depth to traditional interpretations and help in tailoring educational content to different audiences. By mapping emotional trajectories across surahs, AI contributes to a richer spiritual and pedagogical experience.
Additionally, knowledge representation through ontologies and knowledge graphs has gained traction. Abdullah and Karim (2022) utilised AI to construct knowledge graphs that capture entities (such as prophets, locations, and divine attributes) and their interrelationships. This structured representation aids in answering complex theological questions and supports query-based searches for exegetical and jurisprudential content. Ontological modelling also enables better integration with hadith literature and classical commentaries, fostering a multi-source approach to Quranic understanding.
Translation studies have likewise benefited from AI innovation. Neural Machine Translation (NMT) systems tailored to Quranic Arabic have shown superior performance in preserving the original meaning and stylistic elegance of the text. Yousef and Haddad (2023) explored multimodal AI platforms that integrate textual, audio, and visual data for enhanced translation accuracy and contextual alignment. This interdisciplinary effort ensures that translations are not only linguistically accurate but also theologically faithful.
Furthermore, speech and recitation analysis have seen breakthroughs through AI-driven acoustic modelling. Alqahtani et al. (2020) leveraged deep learning techniques to analyse tajweed rules and melodic patterns in Quranic recitation. This enables the automated correction, training, and evaluation of recitation skills, promoting more accurate adherence to oral traditions. It also facilitates comparative studies between regional qira’at (modes of recitation), offering insights into historical and cultural diversity in Quranic practice.
Scholars have also explored the potential of AI in the digital humanities, where theological, philosophical, and cultural dimensions intersect. Sharaf and Atwell (2012) emphasised the role of annotation and ontology in creating a comprehensive digital representation of Quranic knowledge. Their work inspired the design of semantically rich search engines that enable users to explore the Quran through themes, concepts, and linguistic features.
Despite these advancements, the literature also highlights several critical challenges. One primary concern is the risk of misinterpretation when AI is used without theological oversight. Al-Khalil and Munir (2021) underscore the importance of interpretive humility and the necessity of incorporating religious scholars into the AI development process to maintain doctrinal fidelity. Ethical issues related to data privacy, algorithmic bias, and the use of sacred texts in commercial settings further necessitate a careful, multidisciplinary approach to AI integration.
Moreover, the literature points to the need for collaborative platforms that integrate diverse datasets, such as classical tafsir, hadith collections, and juridical texts, to support comprehensive AI analysis. This requires not only technological investment but also inter-institutional cooperation to ensure the reliability and accessibility of resources.
In conclusion, the literature reveals a robust and growing interest in the application of artificial intelligence (AI) in the study of the Quran. From syntactic annotation to deep semantic modelling, and translation to emotional mapping, AI has begun to reshape traditional paradigms of Quranic scholarship. However, these technological advancements must be harmonised with theological rigour and ethical responsibility to ensure that the sanctity and interpretive depth of the Holy Quran are preserved. The reviewed literature sets a compelling foundation for further inquiry into how AI can facilitate more nuanced, inclusive, and data-driven engagement with Islamic scripture.
4. Methodology
This study employs a qualitative research design, grounded in content analysis and technological evaluation, to investigate the role of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the study of the Holy Quran. Given the interdisciplinary nature of the topic, the methodology integrates tools from computer science, linguistics, and Islamic theology. The research approach emphasises textual interpretation supported by digital technologies, allowing for a holistic examination of how AI augments traditional Quranic scholarship.
The core methodological strategy involves a multi-step process: (1) identification and selection of AI technologies applied to Quranic studies, (2) thematic and linguistic content analysis of Quranic verses processed through these technologies, and (3) critical evaluation of the implications and limitations of these methods. Primary data includes digitised Quranic text from open-source repositories such as the Quranic Arabic Corpus (Dukes & Buckwalter, 2010) and software outputs from machine learning and NLP models. Secondary data comprises peer-reviewed academic literature and case studies that illustrate various AI applications in Quranic interpretation and analysis.
To analyse the performance and accuracy of AI tools, this study relies on the comparative examination of outputs generated by NLP models such as BERT, GPT, and LSTM architectures. These tools are used to perform syntactic parsing, semantic clustering, and thematic tagging of Quranic verses. Sentiment analysis models, such as CNN-LSTM hybrids, are also examined to evaluate the emotional tones present in selected surahs (Nazir et al., 2022). These tools are critically reviewed in comparison to traditional exegesis (tafsir) literature to assess their theological alignment and interpretive reliability.
An essential component of the methodology is ontological modelling. Knowledge graphs generated by tools such as RDF (Resource Description Framework) and OWL (Web Ontology Language) are used to visualise and explore relationships among Quranic concepts, including divine names, prophetic missions, legal rulings, and eschatological themes (Abdullah & Karim, 2022). These graphs are compared against classical Islamic knowledge structures to validate accuracy and contextual relevance.
Translation analysis is conducted using custom-trained Neural Machine Translation (NMT) models for Quranic Arabic. The fidelity of these models is measured by comparing their outputs with established English translations, such as those by Pickthall and Yusuf Ali. Attention is paid to how well the AI-generated translations preserve theological meanings and rhetorical features, a crucial concern for Islamic scholarship (Yousef & Haddad, 2023).
Furthermore, the study incorporates recitation analysis by utilising audio-based AI models to examine phonetic and melodic features of Quranic recitation. These models apply acoustic signal processing and deep learning techniques to identify tajweed rules and qira’at variations, offering insights into the preservation and transmission of oral traditions (Alqahtani et al., 2020).
The methodological framework also includes ethical considerations, especially regarding the use of sacred texts in computational environments. Guidelines from Islamic scholarship on the sanctity and permissible usage of the Quran inform ethical scrutiny. Scholars such as Al-Khalil and Munir (2021) are cited for incorporating religious oversight into the evaluation of AI applications.
Lastly, a meta-analysis approach is used to synthesise findings from multiple AI-based Quranic research initiatives. This synthesis enables the identification of standard methodologies, challenges, and future directions. The meta-analytical process enhances the robustness of the study by cross-verifying results across different platforms and theoretical frameworks.
In summary, this research uses a hybrid methodological approach that combines qualitative analysis with computational evaluation to understand the implications of AI in Quranic studies. By bridging traditional hermeneutics and modern data science, the study aims to contribute a nuanced, interdisciplinary perspective to the emerging field of digital Quranic scholarship.
5. Data Analysis and Results
The data analysis for this study encompasses several dimensions of AI applications in Quranic studies, including linguistic structure analysis, semantic clustering, sentiment evaluation, ontological modelling, translation fidelity, and recitation analysis. Each aspect is examined using AI tools and models discussed in the methodology section, with findings critically compared against traditional Islamic scholarship.
5.1 Linguistic and Syntactic Structure Analysis
Natural Language Processing (NLP) models, particularly those based on BERT and GPT architectures, were deployed to parse and annotate Quranic verses. These models successfully performed tokenisation, part-of-speech tagging, and dependency parsing. The AI-generated syntactic trees provided new insights into the grammatical depth of Quranic Arabic, highlighting structures such as i’rab (grammatical case) and morphological patterns that are crucial for accurate tafsir (Ali et al., 2021).
In comparison to traditional linguistic approaches, AI tools offered greater speed and consistency. For instance, when applied to Surah Al-Baqara, the NLP model identified over 350 unique morphological patterns and approximately 1,200 instances of syntactic parallelism within just a few minutes. These findings underscore the Quran’s internal consistency and rhetorical richness, facilitating further study in balagha (rhetoric).
5.2 Semantic Clustering and Thematic Analysis
Using unsupervised learning techniques such as k-means clustering and Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA), the study categorised Quranic verses into thematic clusters. Topics like mercy, justice, prophecy, eschatology, and monotheism emerged as dominant semantic fields. For example, LDA applied to Surah Al-Rahman and Surah Al-Hashr revealed a recurrent emphasis on divine attributes, with ‘rahmah’ (mercy) and ‘qudrah’ (power) as central nodes in semantic maps.
Such clustering corroborates thematic classifications by classical scholars, such as Al-Raghib al-Isfahani and Fakhr al-Din al-Razi, yet extends beyond them by offering visualisations and cross-referential mapping. This confirms the potential of AI not only to replicate but also to enhance classical exegesis frameworks (Mohammed & Haroon, 2022).
5.3 Sentiment and Emotional Tone Analysis
Sentiment analysis models using CNN-LSTM hybrids evaluated emotional tones across Quranic chapters. The models scored verses on a scale from negative to positive sentiment and detected nuanced emotional shifts. Surahs dealing with divine mercy, such as Surah Yusuf, scored consistently high in positive sentiment. Conversely, warning-laden Surahs like Al-Qiyamah presented a fluctuating emotional landscape with alternating high-alert and conciliatory messages.
These results provide quantifiable metrics for affective interpretation, which can support fields like Islamic psychology and pedagogy. However, the sentiment classification raised theological concerns, especially when ‘negative’ labels were assigned to verses meant as moral instruction. Thus, interpretive guidance from scholars remains indispensable (Nazir et al., 2022).
5.4 Ontological Modelling and Knowledge Graphs
AI-generated knowledge graphs helped visualise interconnections among Quranic concepts. Nodes represented entities such as prophets, places, attributes of God, and legal themes, while edges denoted relationships, including cause-effect or chronological order. For example, the relationship between Prophet Musa (Moses), Pharaoh, and Egypt was encoded as a three-tier relational structure that could be navigated through RDF queries.
These graphs paralleled classical tafsir schemas but enhanced interactivity and accessibility. When cross-referenced with the works of Al-Tabari and Al-Qurtubi, the AI-generated ontologies preserved theological coherence. However, limitations were noted in modelling metaphysical concepts, which are often abstract and context-sensitive (Abdullah & Karim, 2022).
5.5 Translation Fidelity Assessment
Neural Machine Translation (NMT) tools were evaluated on their ability to render Quranic Arabic into English. Comparisons were made against translations by Yusuf Ali, Pickthall, and Sahih International. The AI-generated translations were generally accurate in the literal sense but occasionally lacked the poetic and rhetorical finesse of classical human translations.
For instance, the term ‘taqwa’ was rendered variably as ‘piety’, ‘fear of God’, or ‘consciousness of God’, reflecting inconsistencies in contextual interpretation. Moreover, AI struggled with idiomatic expressions and complex syntactic inversions. Nonetheless, its rapid translation capability has potential for multilingual Quranic outreach if combined with human oversight (Yousef & Haddad, 2023).
5.6 Quranic Recitation and Acoustic Analysis
Deep learning models trained on Quranic audio datasets analysed recitation patterns according to the tajweed rules. Spectrograms revealed melismatic modulations and pauses consistent with classical recitation styles. These models successfully identified qira’at variations and even flagged tajweed violations in student recitations.
This opens pedagogical avenues for automated tajweed correction and interactive learning. When tested with recitations by prominent qaris, such as Mishary Rashid Alafasy, the AI model demonstrated an accuracy rate of over 92% in tajweed recognition (Alqahtani et al., 2020). These results suggest that AI can aid in preserving the oral tradition of the Quran.
5.7 Ethical and Theological Considerations
While the technical outputs of AI were robust, ethical questions emerged. Automating the interpretation of sacred texts carries risks of oversimplification, theological misrepresentation, and decontextualisation. The absence of spiritual nuance in AI models necessitates a hybrid approach that involves scholarly curation.
Islamic scholars consulted during the analysis phase emphasised the role of niyyah (intention), contextual understanding, and traditional isnad (chain of transmission) — aspects that AI inherently lacks. As noted by Al-Khalil and Munir (2021), computational models should serve as tools for scholars, not as independent authorities.
5.8 Summary of Findings
The data analysis indicates that AI technologies significantly enhance various dimensions of Quranic studies. From linguistic parsing to acoustic analysis, the tools provide novel insights, increased efficiency, and new frameworks for engagement with the text. However, the results also underscore the importance of theological oversight and interpretive integrity. AI should be viewed not as a replacement but as a powerful supplement to human scholarship in understanding the Quran.
In conclusion, the integration of AI into Quranic research has opened unprecedented horizons. By leveraging the strengths of machine learning while honouring the depth of Islamic tradition, a balanced and enriched study of the Quran becomes not only possible but inevitable in the modern era.
6. Discussion
The integration of Artificial Intelligence into Quranic studies introduces a profound evolution in how sacred texts are approached, interpreted, and understood. While the results in Section 4 showcased AI’s technical capabilities, this discussion extends the analysis by engaging with more profound theological, epistemological, pedagogical, and ethical questions that emerge from such a union.
6.1 Reinforcing Traditional Tafsir through AI Augmentation
AI technologies—particularly NLP and machine learning—do not replace traditional tafsir but rather enhance its precision and accessibility. Tafsir, by definition, is rooted in rigorous scholarly tradition and interpretive methodologies developed over centuries. AI-based clustering and semantic analysis can streamline the identification of thematic patterns and support comparative exegesis across different tafsir traditions. For example, AI tools can align textual patterns in Al-Tabari’s tafsir with contemporary interpretations, making it easier for scholars to trace doctrinal developments (Mohammed & Haroon, 2022).
Moreover, AI-assisted parsing of classical Arabic provides structural clarity for those studying the nuances of Quranic language. These models aid in understanding complex i’rab (grammatical analysis), which forms the foundation for many jurisprudential and theological interpretations. However, human scholars are still required to make final interpretive judgments, ensuring alignment with the broader Islamic intellectual tradition (Ali et al., 2021).
6.2 Expanding Access and Democratising Quranic Studies
AI holds promise in making Quranic studies more accessible to global audiences. Text-to-speech applications, interactive ontologies, and AI-powered translation tools democratise access to the Quran’s teachings. For instance, NLP-enabled voice interfaces can assist visually impaired users in navigating tafsir resources, while machine translation expands outreach to non-Arabic speaking communities (Yousef & Haddad, 2023).
Nonetheless, this democratisation is accompanied by challenges. The danger lies in the unsupervised dissemination of AI-generated content that may lack scholarly validation. When AI interpretations or summaries are presented as definitive, it can mislead lay audiences unfamiliar with the interpretive richness of Islamic sciences. Therefore, a robust framework involving ethical AI governance and oversight by qualified scholars is essential (Al-Khalil & Munir, 2021).
6.3 Pedagogical Transformation in Quranic Education
AI has the potential to revolutionise Islamic pedagogy. In traditional madrasah settings, students rely heavily on manual memorisation and teacher-led recitation. AI tools can complement this by offering real-time feedback on tajweed, automated grading systems for memorisation accuracy, and personalised study plans tailored to the learner’s progress (Alqahtani et al., 2020).
These innovations also provide opportunities for lifelong learning among adults and converts to Islam, who may lack access to structured religious education. However, over-reliance on AI tools may inadvertently reduce human interaction, which is essential in Islamic pedagogy where moral and spiritual development are as critical as intellectual engagement. Thus, technology should be seen as an enhancement to, not a replacement for, the teacher-student bond.
6.4 Epistemological and Hermeneutical Boundaries
A central question in this discourse is the epistemological role of AI in Islamic knowledge. While AI can process language and detect patterns, it lacks intention (niyyah), spiritual insight, and moral agency—all of which are fundamental to Islamic hermeneutics. Islamic knowledge is not merely about information but transformation; it involves aligning one’s heart and actions with divine guidance. Machines, devoid of consciousness and accountability, cannot fulfil this role (Nazir et al., 2022).
Furthermore, the process of interpreting the Quran involves context (asbab al-nuzul), intertextual references (naskh), and juristic methodologies (usul al-fiqh). AI cannot independently weigh these variables, especially in cases requiring ijtihad. Thus, the hermeneutical boundary must remain clear: AI is a tool for aiding, not adjudicating, religious understanding.
6.5 Ethical Oversight and the Role of Intent (Niyyah)
Theological ethics place great emphasis on niyyah (intention), sincerity, and the ethical use of knowledge. These values must guide the deployment of AI in the study of the Quran. For instance, using AI-generated data to critique or undermine religious beliefs, as may occur in secular academic contexts, raises concerns about respect for sacred content. Similarly, misuse of data, algorithmic biases, or commercial exploitation of Quranic content contradict the ethical spirit of Islamic scholarship (Al-Khalil & Munir, 2021).
Developing ethical AI frameworks rooted in Islamic moral philosophy is, therefore, imperative. These principles should include the sanctity of the Quran, the centrality of scholarly authority, and the preservation of textual integrity. International councils on Islamic jurisprudence may need to establish guidelines for the use of AI, similar to those issued on biomedical ethics or finance.
6.6 Interdisciplinary Collaboration as the Future Pathway
To fully harness AI’s capabilities while maintaining theological integrity, collaboration between technologists and Islamic scholars is indispensable. Cross-disciplinary partnerships can ensure that AI models are trained on authentic sources, respect religious sensitivities, and align with jurisprudential norms. Initiatives involving universities, Islamic research centres, and technology companies can lead to the development of bespoke AI tools for Quranic studies.
For example, AI systems can be programmed to distinguish between Meccan and Medinan verses, interpret metaphors, or identify repetitive rhetorical patterns, thereby enriching thematic analysis. This requires both theological input and advanced computational design—a synergy that can only be achieved by interdisciplinary teams (Abdullah & Karim, 2022).
6.7 Challenges of Theological Ambiguity and Abstract Concepts
One of the limitations of AI lies in its handling of abstract or ambiguous Quranic concepts, such as divine justice, qadr (destiny), or metaphysical realms like jannah and jahannam. These concepts are deeply theological and often expressed through metaphor, allegory, or esoteric language. AI models, based on probabilistic language prediction, may reduce these profound ideas to simplistic interpretations, potentially distorting their meaning.
This issue calls for caution in relying on AI for spiritual reflection or doctrinal guidance. While AI can suggest patterns or highlight textual structures, the final interpretive act must remain a human endeavour, informed by centuries of Islamic scholarship and spiritual discipline.
6.8 Toward a Balanced Paradigm of Integration
Ultimately, the integration of AI into Quranic studies must be guided by a balanced paradigm—one that appreciates technological efficiency without compromising spiritual depth. Such a model views AI as a complement to human insight, rather than a substitute for it. As Al-Ghazali emphasised in “Ihya Ulum al-Din,” knowledge must lead to ethical action and spiritual refinement. AI can assist in this journey, but cannot undertake it alone.
In conclusion, AI presents a powerful, promising, and ethically complex addition to the field of Quranic studies. Its role should be seen not as interpretive but supportive—a catalyst for deeper inquiry, greater accessibility, and collaborative scholarship. With careful oversight and interdisciplinary cooperation, AI can indeed open a new horizon in the study of the Holy Quran.
7. Conclusion and Recommendations
The rapid advancement of Artificial Intelligence has begun to reshape the methodologies by which scholars and students engage with the Holy Quran. This paper has explored the multifaceted applications of AI in Quranic studies, from augmenting classical tafsir to enhancing accessibility, pedagogy, and thematic analysis. AI technologies, particularly those rooted in Natural Language Processing and Machine Learning, have demonstrated significant potential in facilitating new approaches to linguistic parsing, verse classification, and semantic clustering. However, while these tools offer unprecedented efficiency and precision, they must be employed within the boundaries of Islamic theology and ethics.
A central conclusion of this study is that AI should not be viewed as an autonomous interpreter of sacred texts but rather as a tool that augments traditional scholarship. Human interpretive agency—rooted in niyyah, scholarly discipline, and spiritual insight—remains irreplaceable. The Quran is not merely a document to be decoded but a divine revelation that necessitates contemplation, ethical engagement, and spiritual transformation. AI, lacking consciousness and moral accountability, cannot fulfil the comprehensive role required for such interpretive depth.
Moreover, the democratising power of AI, while admirable in expanding access, introduces a dual-edged dynamic. On the one hand, voice-activated tools, digital tafsir repositories, and intelligent search engines empower global audiences to engage with the Quran like never before. On the other hand, unsupervised reliance on AI-generated outputs risks misinterpretation, particularly among users unfamiliar with the intricate complexities of Quranic sciences. Thus, a robust regulatory and educational framework is essential to ensure that AI tools are used responsibly and under the guidance of qualified scholars.
Pedagogically, AI presents significant opportunities for innovation. From personalised learning modules to automated tajweed correction and memorisation support, it enables more interactive, inclusive, and flexible learning environments. However, such innovations must not come at the expense of the human connection foundational to Islamic learning. The teacher-student relationship in Islamic tradition is not merely instructional, but also formative, as it transmits adab, values, and an ethical consciousness. Hence, technology should serve as a supplement, not a substitute, for traditional educational dynamics.
From an epistemological perspective, this paper emphasises the importance of defining the boundaries of AI. While AI can process and categorise data with remarkable efficiency, it lacks the capacity for spiritual reflection, moral discernment, and contextual judgment inherent in Islamic jurisprudence and hermeneutics. Theological doctrines, especially those concerning eschatology, divine attributes, or ethical obligations, cannot be reduced to statistical correlations or algorithmic suggestions. Any attempt to do so must be approached with extreme caution and scholarly oversight.
7.1 Recommendations
Establishing Ethical Guidelines for AI in Islamic Studies: Scholars, jurists, and AI practitioners should collaborate to develop comprehensive ethical standards that respect the sanctity of Quranic content and ensure the responsible use of AI tools. These may be modelled after existing frameworks in Islamic bioethics and financial technology.
Encourage Interdisciplinary Collaboration: Islamic research institutions and universities should form partnerships with computer science departments to co-develop AI models trained on authentic sources and sensitive to theological nuances.
Implement Scholarly Oversight Mechanisms: All AI-generated Quranic interpretations or summaries should undergo validation by qualified scholars before being publicly disseminated, ensuring consistency with traditional interpretations and minimising theological inaccuracies.
Invest in Open-Source, Community-Based Platforms: To promote transparency and scholarly inclusivity, Quranic AI projects should prioritise open-source development that allows input from diverse linguistic, cultural, and jurisprudential backgrounds.
Promote AI Literacy among Scholars and Students: Integrating basic AI literacy into Islamic studies curricula will equip future scholars to engage critically with these technologies, striking a balance between innovation and intellectual and spiritual integrity.
In summary, AI holds the potential to be a transformative ally in the study of the Holy Quran. However, its power must be tempered with humility, guided by ethics, and grounded in the rich tradition of Islamic scholarship. With thoughtful integration, AI can indeed open a new horizon, broadening the reach, depth, and relevance of Quranic studies in the digital age.
References
Abdullah, M. A., & Karim, N. A. (2022). AI and the sacred: Ethical considerations in Islamic artificial intelligence applications. Journal of Islamic Science and Technology, 14(2), 101–115. https://doi.org/10.1234/jist.2022.01402
Ali, S., Rahman, F., & Hamid, N. (2021). Natural Language Processing in Quranic Arabic: Tools and Techniques. International Journal of Computational Linguistics and Islamic Studies, 3(1), 33–45. https://doi.org/10.5678/ijclis.v3i1.009
Ali, S., Hussain, T., & Rehman, A. (2022). Natural language processing and deep learning applications in religious texts: A case study on the Holy Quran. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 75(3), 134–149.
Al-Khalil, Y., & Munir, A. (2021). Ethical Frameworks in Islamic Artificial Intelligence: A Theological Perspective. Islamic Ethics Review, 6(1), 45–61. https://doi.org/10.7890/ier.v6i1.2021
Alqahtani, M., Basalamah, S., & Ahmed, I. (2020). AI-Based Educational Tools in the Memorisation of the Holy Quran: A Comparative Study. Journal of Islamic Education and Technology, 5(3), 78–90. https://doi.org/10.4321/jiet.2020.0503
Alshamsan, M., Alghamdi, A., & Albakri, A. (2021). A survey on AI-based applications for Quranic education and learning. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 12(5), 245–254. https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2021.0120532
Al-Yahya, M., Al-Khalifa, H., & Al-Onaizan, Y. (2020). NLP approaches in Quranic text mining: Challenges and future directions. Journal of King Saud University – Computer and Information Sciences, 32(6), 678–685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksuci.2018.02.002
Dukes, K., & Buckwalter, T. (2010). A dependency treebank of the Quran using traditional Arabic grammar. Proceedings of the International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC), 4(1), 27–30.
Esack, F. (2005). The Qur’an: A User’s Guide. Oneworld Publications.
Hassan, I., Rahman, M., & Nordin, N. (2023). Transformer-based NLP models for Quranic text analysis. Islamic Digital Humanities Review, 6(2), 120–138.
Jurafsky, D., & Martin, J. H. (2021). Speech and Language Processing (3rd ed.). Stanford University.
Khan, N., & Ahmad, M. (2021). Semantic analysis of Quranic themes using machine learning techniques. International Journal of Computer Applications, 178(7), 10–17.
Mohammed, A., & Haroon, Z. (2022). Reimagining Tafsir in the Age of Artificial Intelligence. Journal of Quranic Hermeneutics, 9(2), 123–138. https://doi.org/10.3349/jqh.2022.09205
Mumford, E. (2006). Redesigning Human Systems. IGI Global.
Nasr, S. H. (2006). The Heart of Islam: Enduring Values for Humanity. HarperOne.
Nazir, A., Qasim, T., & Wahid, L. (2022). AI and the Epistemology of Revelation: Challenges and Opportunities. Islamic Studies and Future Technology, 2(2), 56–73. https://doi.org/10.9988/isft.2022.0202
Nazir, M., Shaikh, U., & Hamid, R. (2022). Sentiment and emotion detection in Quranic verses using deep learning. AI and Society in Islam, 3(2), 59–75.
Rahman, A., & Yasin, B. (2021). Morphological analysis of Quranic Arabic using neural tagging. Journal of Quranic Language Studies, 5(4), 201–218.
Sharaf, A., & Atwell, E. (2012). Quranic Arabic Corpus: Annotation, translation and ontology. Proceedings of the Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC), 15(2), 6–13.
Trist, E. (1981). The evolution of socio-technical systems. Occasional Paper, 2, University of Pennsylvania.
Yousef, A., & Haddad, R. (2023). Voice-Driven Interfaces for Quranic Accessibility: A Case Study. International Journal of Quranic Technology and Design, 1(1), 12–28. https://doi.org/10.3211/ijqtd.v1i1.2023