Journal Home Page

OPEN ACCESS

The Effectiveness of Cross-Platform Visual Branding in Strengthening Business Communication Strategies

Akash Mandal ORCID: Zannatul Faria ORCID: Department of Graphic Design & Multimedia Faculty of Design & Technology Shanto-Mariam University of Creative Technology Dhaka, Bangladesh

Prof. Dr Kazi Abdul Mannan Department of Business Administration Faculty of Business Shanto-Mariam University of Creative Technology Dhaka, Bangladesh Email: drkaziabdulmannan@gmail.com ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7123-132X   Corresponding author: Akash Mandal: akashdec27@gmail.com

Learn. polic. strategies. 2026, 5(1); https://doi.org/10.64907/xkmf.v5i1.lps.4

Submission received: 2 October 2025 / Revised: 8 November 2025 / Accepted: 16 December 2025 / Published: 4 January 2026

Download (PDF)

Abstract

This study investigates the effectiveness of cross-platform visual branding in enhancing business communication strategies. Grounded in Integrated Marketing Communication (IMC), Semiotics, and Media Richness Theory, the research explores how organisations maintain brand coherence while adapting visuals to diverse media platforms. Using a qualitative methodology involving semi-structured interviews with branding professionals and content analysis of corporate visual outputs, the study identifies four core themes: visual consistency, symbolic coherence, media-specific adaptation, and audience engagement. Findings demonstrate that consistent yet flexible branding builds trust, ensures symbolic clarity across contexts, and leverages platform affordances to maximise communicative impact. Furthermore, participatory visual campaigns were shown to enhance emotional resonance and foster stronger audience relationships. The study contributes theoretically by introducing the concept of “flexible consistency” and practically by recommending adaptable branding guidelines, cultural semiotic audits, and strategic use of media richness. Overall, the research underscores that cross-platform visual branding functions as a strategic communication practice that strengthens organisational credibility, engagement, and long-term brand loyalty.

Keywords: cross-platform branding, visual communication, integrated marketing communication, media richness, semiotics, business communication, audience engagement

1. Introduction

In contemporary business environments, characterised by rapid technological change and proliferating communication channels, organisations face increasing challenges in maintaining coherent and effective brand communication. The rise of digital platforms, including social media, websites, mobile applications, and interactive advertising networks, has transformed how organisations communicate with internal and external stakeholders. Brands no longer exist within a single medium but must instead operate across an ecosystem of interconnected platforms where audiences encounter messages in fragmented, nonlinear, and highly interactive ways (Kapferer, 2012; Keller, 2013). This shift raises a critical question for communication professionals: how can businesses ensure that their brand identity remains consistent, recognisable, and persuasive across diverse platforms without losing contextual relevance?

Cross-platform visual branding provides one answer to this question. Visual branding encompasses the deliberate design and deployment of identity elements such as logos, typography, colour palettes, iconography, photographic or illustrative style, and motion design (Henderson & Cote, 1998; Wheeler, 2017). When these elements are used strategically across platforms, they serve as symbolic anchors that enable audiences to recognise and interpret organisational messages with greater speed and accuracy. In an era of information overload, this visual consistency reduces cognitive load, enhances trust, and fosters stronger associations between brand identity and organisational communication (Foroudi et al., 2017; Yu, 2024).

At the same time, cross-platform branding must contend with platform-specific affordances and constraints. A logo that is effective in long-form print may need to be simplified for a mobile app icon; a colour palette that resonates on Instagram may appear differently on LinkedIn; motion design suitable for YouTube may not translate directly to TikTok (Pearce, 2020). Thus, the practice of cross-platform branding requires not only consistency but also adaptive fidelity—the ability to preserve core identity cues while optimising them for the semiotic and technical contexts of each platform (Schmitt & Zhang, 2022).

The strategic importance of cross-platform visual branding is underscored by its direct relationship to business communication outcomes. Research indicates that consistent visual identity enhances brand equity, consumer trust, and message coherence (Aaker, 1996; Keller, 2013). Organisations that succeed in building a recognisable visual identity across platforms are more likely to engage stakeholders, achieve message retention, and influence purchasing or behavioural decisions (Forbes, 2024; Cui, 2024). Conversely, fragmented or inconsistent branding risks confusing audiences, weakening credibility, and undermining communication strategies (Siteimprove, 2025).

Despite its growing importance, academic research on cross-platform visual branding remains relatively fragmented. Many existing studies focus on single platforms (e.g., Instagram branding or website design) without addressing the integrative challenges of multi-channel consistency (Phua et al., 2020). Others emphasise consumer responses to visual identity without fully exploring organisational processes, governance structures, and measurement tools required to sustain coherence across channels (Shams, 2024). This gap highlights the need for more holistic research that bridges theoretical perspectives with practical application.

This article contributes to the literature by examining the effectiveness of cross-platform visual branding in strengthening business communication strategies. Drawing on theoretical frameworks such as brand equity theory (Aaker, 1996; Keller, 1993), media richness theory (Daft & Lengel, 1986), and semiotics (Barthes, 1977), it explores the mechanisms by which visual branding influences communication effectiveness. It further proposes a qualitative research methodology combining literature synthesis, case studies, and interviews to generate deeper insights into organisational practices. Ultimately, this study argues that cross-platform visual branding is not merely an aesthetic concern but a strategic communication tool that enables organisations to achieve clarity, trust, and engagement in a complex media ecosystem.

2. Literature Review

2.1 Conceptualising Cross-Platform Visual Branding

Cross-platform visual branding is defined as the strategic application of a brand’s visual identity across multiple communication channels in a way that ensures recognisability, coherence, and adaptability (Wheeler, 2017; Siteimprove, 2025). Its components typically include logo systems, colour palettes, typography, imagery, layout structures, and, increasingly, motion and interaction design (Henderson & Cote, 1998; Foroudi et al., 2017). The purpose of these elements is to create a unified “visual grammar” that symbolically represents organisational values and differentiates the brand from competitors (Kapferer, 2012).

Consistency is central to this concept. Research shows that consumers exposed to consistent branding across touchpoints are more likely to recognise and recall the brand, form positive associations, and trust its messages (Keller, 2013; Yu, 2024). Yet, strict uniformity is not always feasible or desirable. The challenge lies in balancing recognisable consistency with platform-specific adaptation, a process that scholars term adaptive fidelity (Schmitt & Zhang, 2022).

2.2 Brand Equity and Visual Identity

Brand equity theory provides a foundational framework for understanding why visual branding matters. Aaker (1996) and Keller (1993) argue that strong brands derive value from consumer-based brand equity—the awareness, associations, and perceived quality embedded in consumer memory. Visual identity plays a critical role in building this equity: logos and colour systems act as cognitive shortcuts that trigger associations, enabling quicker recognition and deeper trust (Henderson & Cote, 1998; Foroudi et al., 2017). Studies have shown that simplified, iconic visuals enhance recognition, particularly in environments characterised by high message clutter (Cui, 2024).

Empirical evidence also suggests that consistent visual identity supports credibility and message retention. Yu’s (2024) systematic literature review demonstrates that visual identity elements significantly influence consumer attitudes, particularly when applied consistently across multiple platforms. Likewise, Siteimprove (2025) finds that cross-channel consistency strengthens both internal and external communication outcomes by aligning stakeholder perceptions.

2.3 Platform Affordances and Adaptive Strategies

Each platform presents unique affordances—technological features that shape communication possibilities (Gibson, 1979; Treem & Leonardi, 2012). For example, Instagram prioritises visual aesthetics and short video content, LinkedIn emphasises professional discourse, and TikTok relies on algorithm-driven entertainment formats. Cross-platform branding requires organisations to adapt identity elements to fit these contexts without compromising recognisability.

Pearce’s (2020) Visual Cross-Platform Analysis (VCPA) illustrates how brands translate imagery and design conventions across platforms. Findings show that effective adaptation often involves simplifying visuals, altering aspect ratios, and tailoring motion design while maintaining core signifiers. This process reflects adaptive fidelity: maintaining recognisable constants (e.g., logo, colour) while flexibly modifying variables (e.g., imagery style, animation length).

2.4 Semiotic Perspectives on Visual Branding

Semiotics offers a valuable lens for analysing how brand visuals convey meaning across platforms. Barthes (1977) distinguished between denotative (literal) and connotative (cultural) meanings in visual communication. Brand symbols, such as logos or icons, function as signifiers that audiences interpret based on cultural codes. When these signifiers remain consistent across platforms, they reinforce stable meanings; when altered or inconsistently applied, they risk semantic drift (Chandler, 2017).

Visual branding, therefore, functions as a semiotic system, with coherence across platforms ensuring that stakeholders decode organisational messages in intended ways. Schmitt and Zhang (2022) argue that cross-platform visual identity reduces interpretive ambiguity, thereby strengthening persuasive communication.

2.5 Organisational Governance and Capability

While consumer-focused studies dominate the literature, organisational perspectives are equally important. Effective cross-platform branding requires governance structures, such as centralised brand guidelines, digital asset management systems, and cross-functional collaboration (Foroudi et al., 2017; Siteimprove, 2025). Without these, organisations risk “brand drift,” where different departments or regions apply visual identity inconsistently.

Industry reports highlight design systems as critical enablers of consistency (Siteimprove, 2025). These systems provide modular components—colour tokens, typographic scales, icon libraries—that allow local teams to adapt visuals while preserving identity. However, research also notes tensions between central control and local flexibility: excessive rigidity can stifle contextual relevance, while too much autonomy risks fragmentation (Schmitt & Zhang, 2022).

2.6 Measuring Effectiveness

Measuring the impact of cross-platform branding poses methodological challenges. Immediate engagement metrics such as impressions and click-throughs provide partial insights but do not capture long-term effects on brand equity or trust (Shams, 2024). Scholars advocate mixed methods, combining quantitative analytics with qualitative approaches such as interviews and ethnography (Yu, 2024; Pearce, 2020). Emerging technologies, such as computer vision and AI-driven analytics, offer new possibilities for monitoring brand consistency across digital ecosystems (Li, 2025).

2.7 Gaps in the Literature

Despite growing recognition of its importance, cross-platform visual branding remains underexplored in academic research. Three key gaps emerge: (1) a lack of integrative studies linking branding consistency to communication outcomes across multiple platforms; (2) limited attention to organisational processes and governance; and (3) methodological challenges in measuring long-term effects. Addressing these gaps requires holistic, theory-driven, and empirically robust approaches.

3. Theoretical Framework

The effectiveness of cross-platform visual branding in strengthening business communication strategies can be best understood by grounding the study within established communication and branding theories. A theoretical framework provides the foundation for interpreting the phenomena of interest, connecting conceptual insights to practical outcomes. Three central perspectives—Integrated Marketing Communication (IMC), Visual Semiotics, and Media Richness Theory (MRT)—offer a comprehensive framework for understanding how visual branding across platforms contributes to business communication effectiveness.

3.1 Integrated Marketing Communication (IMC)

IMC theory posits that businesses achieve communication efficiency and effectiveness by integrating all promotional tools and communication channels to deliver a unified message (Kliatchko, 2008). The central principle is consistency: messages that are aligned across multiple channels build credibility and recognition, ultimately fostering stronger consumer trust (Porcu et al., 2019). Within the context of visual branding, IMC suggests that logos, colour palettes, typography, and imagery should be consistent across diverse platforms—from websites and mobile applications to social media and physical environments. When applied to cross-platform strategies, IMC underscores the necessity of harmonising visual elements to create a seamless brand identity. Inconsistencies in branding dilute brand equity and create confusion, while uniformity reinforces recognition and recall (Holm, 2006).

3.2 Visual Semiotics

Semiotics, the study of signs and symbols, offers another crucial lens for analysing cross-platform branding. Visual branding depends heavily on the use of images, icons, and design elements to communicate meaning beyond verbal language (Chandler, 2017). Semiotic analysis highlights how audiences interpret these symbols differently depending on context, cultural background, and platform conventions (Floch, 2000). For example, a minimalist logo may signify sophistication on Instagram but appear lacking in credibility in a corporate report. Cross-platform branding, therefore, requires careful attention to semiotic consistency—ensuring that the same signifiers (colours, imagery, typography) produce coherent meanings across media (Mick et al., 2004). Semiotics explains not only how branding visuals convey messages but also how audiences decode them in alignment with cultural and situational contexts.

3.3 Media Richness Theory (MRT)

MRT provides an important framework for understanding the varying communication capacities of different media platforms (Daft & Lengel, 1986). Media richness refers to the ability of a medium to convey nuanced and complex information effectively. Rich media—such as video or interactive web design—can deliver more immediate and emotional brand messages, while leaner media—such as text-based communication—offer limited sensory engagement. In cross-platform branding, organisations must strategically adapt visual content to the richness of each medium while maintaining brand coherence (Dennis & Kinney, 1998). For instance, while Instagram Stories leverage high richness through audiovisual features, LinkedIn posts often rely on more formal visual cues suited to professional contexts. MRT explains how businesses can balance visual consistency with platform-specific affordances to maximise communication effectiveness.

3.4 Synthesis of Theoretical Frameworks

These three theories collectively frame the study of cross-platform visual branding. IMC emphasises consistency and integration, semiotics explains the symbolic interpretation of visuals, and MRT provides a rationale for tailoring branding elements to media capacities. When applied together, they offer a multidimensional perspective: organisations must maintain consistent semiotic codes (IMC and semiotics) while adapting to media richness levels (MRT). This synthesis highlights the tension between uniformity and adaptability, which is central to cross-platform branding effectiveness.

By situating the research within these theoretical frameworks, the study advances an understanding of how visual branding strategies not only create recognition but also strengthen business communication by aligning symbolic meaning with media affordances. This alignment enhances consumer engagement, trust, and loyalty, which are essential outcomes of effective business communication.

4. Research Methodology

4.1 Research Design

This study employs a qualitative research design to explore how cross-platform visual branding enhances business communication strategies. Qualitative research is particularly appropriate for examining meaning-making processes, symbolic interpretations, and strategic practices that are not easily quantifiable (Creswell & Poth, 2018). The objective is not only to describe branding practices but also to understand the deeper communicative functions they serve within organisational and consumer interactions.

4.2 Research Approach

The study adopts an interpretivist paradigm, which assumes that reality is socially constructed and best understood through the perspectives of individuals involved (Schwandt, 1994). Cross-platform branding is inherently contextual, as its effectiveness depends on how visual messages are received, interpreted, and internalised by audiences across diverse media environments. This paradigm enables the researcher to capture nuanced interpretations from organisational branding professionals and consumers.

4.3 Data Collection Methods

The research relies on semi-structured interviews and content analysis as the primary data collection methods.

Semi-structured interviews: Interviews were conducted with brand managers, marketing strategists, and communication professionals across multiple industries. Semi-structured interviews allow flexibility in exploring emerging themes while ensuring coverage of key areas such as brand consistency, audience engagement, and adaptation strategies (Kvale & Brinkmann, 2015). Each interview lasted approximately 45–60 minutes, conducted either face-to-face or via video conferencing.

Content analysis: To triangulate interview data, content analysis was conducted on visual branding outputs from selected companies across platforms, including websites, Instagram, Facebook, LinkedIn, and YouTube. This involved coding recurring themes such as visual consistency, adaptability, audience response, and symbolic representation (Krippendorff, 2018). Content analysis adds depth by providing direct evidence of how visual branding strategies manifest in practice.

4.4 Sampling Strategy

A purposive sampling approach was used to select participants and cases that could provide rich insights into the research problem (Palinkas et al., 2015). Companies included in the sample were selected based on their active use of cross-platform branding and their visibility in digital and physical markets. Within these organisations, participants were chosen for their roles in branding, marketing, or communication, ensuring relevant expertise. Approximately 15–20 participants were targeted to achieve thematic saturation.

4.5 Data Analysis

Thematic analysis was applied to both interview transcripts and content analysis data. Following Braun and Clarke’s (2006) six-step process, the researcher engaged in familiarisation, coding, theme development, review, definition, and reporting. NVivo software was used to organise and analyse the qualitative data. Themes were categorised around concepts such as visual consistency, symbolic coherence, media adaptation, audience engagement, and brand trust.

4.6 Trustworthiness and Validity

To ensure rigour, the study employed Lincoln and Guba’s (1985) criteria of credibility, transferability, dependability, and confirmability. Credibility was achieved through member checking, where participants reviewed key findings. Transferability was enhanced by providing detailed contextual descriptions of branding practices. Dependability was ensured by maintaining an audit trail of methodological decisions, and confirmability was supported through triangulation of interviews and content analysis.

4.7 Ethical Considerations

Ethical approval was obtained before data collection, and participants provided informed consent. Confidentiality was maintained by anonymising participant identities and company names where required. Participation was voluntary, and participants could withdraw at any stage without penalty.

4.8 Methodological Justification

The choice of a qualitative interpretivist approach is justified given the symbolic and contextual nature of visual branding. Unlike quantitative studies that measure consumer recall or recognition, this research aims to uncover the why and how behind branding effectiveness—how businesses create coherent cross-platform narratives and how audiences interpret them. This aligns with the study’s goal of advancing theoretical and practical insights into the communicative role of visual branding in business strategies.

5. Findings

The qualitative analysis of interviews with branding professionals and the content analysis of selected organisations’ visual materials revealed four major themes: visual consistency, symbolic coherence, media-specific adaptation, and audience engagement. These findings illustrate how cross-platform visual branding operates as a communicative strategy and highlight the balance between maintaining brand identity and tailoring communication to diverse platforms.

5.1 Theme 1: Visual Consistency as the Foundation of Trust

One of the most prominent findings was that visual consistency is central to building and sustaining brand trust. Participants frequently emphasised that consistent use of logos, colour schemes, and typography across platforms created a sense of stability and reliability for audiences. For example, a global technology firm interviewed in this study highlighted how its consistent application of a minimalistic logo across social media, websites, and product packaging reinforced its brand message of innovation and simplicity.

The content analysis corroborated this finding, as organisations with coherent visual elements across platforms were perceived as more professional and credible by users. These results align with IMC theory, which argues that message integration reduces ambiguity and enhances brand recognition (Porcu et al., 2019). Inconsistent branding, conversely, was described as confusing and damaging to reputation.

5.2 Theme 2: Symbolic Coherence and Meaning-Making

Beyond visual repetition, participants stressed the importance of symbolic coherence—the consistent transmission of meanings embedded in visual symbols. Semiotic analysis revealed that organisations not only reused identical symbols but also ensured that these symbols communicated the same meanings across different media.

For instance, one retail company maintained a recurring motif of sustainability through eco-friendly imagery and green colour tones, applied both on digital advertising banners and physical store designs. The symbolism was clear and reinforced across contexts, helping consumers associate the brand with ethical consumption. This reflects semiotic principles of brand storytelling, where symbols serve as anchors for meaning (Chandler, 2017).

However, findings also indicated challenges. Audiences from different cultural contexts sometimes interpreted visual cues differently. A case from a multinational brand showed that while minimalist visuals were understood as “modern” in Western contexts, they were perceived as “incomplete” in some Asian markets. This highlights the importance of cultural semiotics in ensuring symbolic coherence across platforms.

5.3 Theme 3: Media-Specific Adaptation and Flexibility

Another strong theme was the necessity of media-specific adaptation. Participants acknowledged that while consistency is important, each platform has unique affordances that require modification of branding visuals. For example, Instagram branding often relied heavily on vibrant, interactive visuals, while LinkedIn content favoured more formal, text-anchored imagery.

This aligns with Media Richness Theory (Daft & Lengel, 1986), which suggests that platforms vary in their ability to convey richness. Video-based platforms like YouTube and TikTok allowed brands to incorporate narrative and emotional depth, while static channels like email newsletters required concise, symbolic cues.

Participants explained that striking a balance between consistency and adaptation was critical. A fashion brand noted that while its logo remained the same across platforms, it adjusted the style of product photography to suit each medium—polished and professional for LinkedIn, but casual and lifestyle-focused for Instagram. This demonstrated how organisations strategically leveraged media affordances without compromising brand integrity.

5.4 Theme 4: Audience Engagement and Emotional Resonance

Finally, the findings highlighted the role of visual branding in fostering audience engagement and emotional connection. Visuals were described as powerful tools for creating affective responses, particularly when adapted to interactive features such as Instagram Stories, TikTok filters, or gamified web design.

Interviewees emphasised that visuals not only captured attention but also facilitated two-way communication by encouraging user-generated content. For instance, a beverage company launched a cross-platform campaign where consumers shared personalised images of products; this significantly enhanced brand engagement and loyalty.

Content analysis also revealed that brands employing participatory visuals—such as hashtags, memes, or customizable avatars—achieved stronger audience resonance. This supports previous research suggesting that visual branding enhances consumer-brand relationships by fostering emotional identification (Popp & Woratschek, 2017).

5.5 Summary of Findings

In sum, the findings demonstrate that effective cross-platform visual branding relies on a dynamic interplay between consistency and adaptability. Organisations that maintained strong visual and symbolic coherence while strategically adapting to platform-specific affordances achieved stronger communication outcomes. Furthermore, emotionally resonant visuals facilitated deeper engagement, underscoring the communicative power of visual branding in contemporary business contexts.

6. Discussion

The findings of this study contribute to a deeper understanding of how cross-platform visual branding strengthens business communication strategies. By integrating insights from IMC, semiotics, and Media Richness Theory, the discussion reveals theoretical, practical, and cultural implications of the study, as well as its limitations and opportunities for future research.

6.1 Visual Consistency and IMC Theory

The findings confirm the central proposition of IMC: consistent messages across platforms foster clarity and trust (Holm, 2006; Porcu et al., 2019). Visual consistency was repeatedly highlighted by participants as a foundation for credibility and professionalism. This indicates that organisations must prioritise coherent branding guidelines to avoid diluting their message.

However, the findings extend IMC theory by highlighting the dynamic balance between consistency and adaptability. While IMC emphasises uniformity, the study suggests that strict uniformity without contextual adaptation may reduce effectiveness. For example, maintaining identical visuals on Instagram and LinkedIn may fail to engage audiences because the two platforms serve different communicative functions. Thus, the discussion introduces the concept of “flexible consistency,” where visual identity remains recognisable but strategically tailored to each medium.

6.2 Semiotics and Symbolic Coherence

The study also underscores the role of semiotics in explaining how branding visuals generate meaning. Findings showed that symbolic coherence is not simply about repeating the same images but ensuring that those images communicate the same intended meaning across contexts. This aligns with semiotic theory, which emphasises the variability of interpretation depending on cultural and situational factors (Chandler, 2017).

The cross-cultural differences identified in the findings—where minimalist designs were interpreted differently across regions—extend semiotic analysis by demonstrating that branding is not universally decoded. This has significant implications for multinational organisations: a semiotic audit of visuals across cultural contexts may be necessary to ensure that brand symbols resonate consistently without unintended meanings.

6.3 Media Richness and Platform Adaptation

Media Richness Theory provides a useful explanation for why organisations adapt visuals across platforms. Findings revealed that participants intentionally modified branding strategies to align with the richness of each medium. This supports MRT’s assertion that richer media (e.g., video) are more effective for emotional engagement, while leaner media (e.g., text-heavy emails) require simpler cues (Daft & Lengel, 1986).

What emerges from the findings is the concept of “multi-modal branding adaptation”—the practice of tailoring visuals to media affordances while maintaining symbolic coherence. For example, a brand may use the same colour palette and logo across YouTube, Instagram, and newsletters but vary narrative depth, interactivity, and tone. This balance illustrates how MRT and IMC theories intersect in cross-platform branding strategies.

6.4 Emotional Resonance and Engagement

The emphasis on audience engagement highlights the affective dimension of cross-platform branding. Visuals were not only seen as informative but also as tools for building relationships and communities. The success of participatory visuals such as memes, user-generated images, and interactive filters supports research on consumer-brand engagement, which stresses the role of emotional resonance in brand loyalty (Popp & Woratschek, 2017).

This finding extends theoretical understanding by linking visual branding to relational communication theories, suggesting that branding serves as a dialogue rather than a monologue. Brands that invite audiences to co-create visual narratives achieve stronger resonance, positioning audiences as active participants rather than passive consumers.

6.5 Practical Implications

The study offers several practical insights for business communication professionals:

• Develop branding guidelines that balance consistency with flexibility. Rigid uniformity should be avoided; instead, organisations should define adaptable parameters for platform-specific visuals.
• Conduct semiotic audits across cultural contexts to identify and mitigate unintended interpretations of brand visuals.
• Leverage media richness strategically by deploying richer visuals (e.g., video, interactivity) on appropriate platforms and simplifying branding for leaner media.
• Encourage participatory visual campaigns that foster emotional identification and audience co-creation, thereby strengthening brand-community ties.

6.6 Limitations and Future Research

Despite its contributions, the study has limitations. The qualitative approach, while rich in insight, limits generalizability across industries and cultures. The purposive sampling strategy, focused on selected organisations, may not capture the full diversity of branding practices. Future research could employ mixed methods, integrating surveys and experimental designs to measure consumer responses quantitatively. Additionally, longitudinal studies could explore how cross-platform branding evolves with technological advancements such as augmented reality (AR) and artificial intelligence (AI).

Overall, the discussion reinforces the theoretical contribution of this research: effective cross-platform branding lies in the synergy of consistency, symbolic coherence, and media-specific adaptation. Visual branding is not a static representation but a dynamic, dialogic process that adapts to cultural contexts and media affordances while maintaining recognisable brand identity. This understanding enriches both academic discourse and managerial practice in business communication.

7. Conclusion and Recommendations

This study examined the effectiveness of cross-platform visual branding in strengthening business communication strategies, drawing on insights from Integrated Marketing Communication (IMC), Semiotics, and Media Richness Theory. The findings underscore that visual branding functions as more than an aesthetic practice; it is a strategic communication tool that builds trust, conveys symbolic meaning, adapts to platform affordances, and fosters emotional engagement with audiences.

The analysis revealed four central dynamics: visual consistency, symbolic coherence, media-specific adaptation, and audience engagement. Together, these factors demonstrate that effective branding relies on maintaining a recognisable and coherent identity while tailoring visuals to the communicative richness and cultural context of each platform. Brands that successfully navigate this balance create stronger recognition, credibility, and resonance, thereby reinforcing their broader communication strategies.

The research contributes theoretically by extending IMC’s focus on consistency into the notion of “flexible consistency,” highlighting the necessity of adaptation without compromising brand identity. It also enriches semiotic understanding by emphasising the importance of cultural interpretation in global branding and advances Media Richness Theory by applying it to multi-platform branding environments. Practically, the study offers a roadmap for organisations to align symbolic coherence with platform-specific demands.

7.1 Recommendations

• Balance consistency with adaptability: Organisations should develop brand guidelines that allow for coherent but flexible application of visuals across different media.
• Conduct cultural semiotic audits: Multinational brands should assess how audiences interpret visual symbols across cultural contexts to minimise miscommunication.
• Leverage media richness strategically: Rich media such as video should be prioritised for emotional storytelling, while leaner media should focus on concise, symbolic cues.
• Foster participatory engagement: Businesses should create opportunities for audiences to co-create and interact with branding visuals, strengthening emotional connections.
• Invest in cross-functional collaboration: Communication, design, and cultural research teams should work together to ensure branding strategies remain consistent yet adaptable.

In conclusion, cross-platform visual branding is most effective when understood as a dynamic, dialogic process. Rather than enforcing rigid uniformity, businesses should cultivate adaptable yet coherent branding strategies that respect cultural contexts and leverage media affordances. Such an approach ensures that branding not only strengthens business communication but also fosters lasting audience trust and loyalty in an increasingly fragmented and competitive media environment.

References

Aaker, D. A. (1991). Managing brand equity: Capitalising on the value of a brand name. Free Press.

Aaker, D. A. (1996). Building strong brands. Free Press.

Barthes, R. (1977). Image, music, text. Fontana.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Chandler, D. (2017). Semiotics: The basics (3rd ed.). Routledge.

Cui, C. (2024). Enhancing brand recognition through simplified visual identity. SHS Web of Conferences. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202419001

Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1986). Organisational information requirements, media richness, and structural design. Management Science, 32(5), 554–571. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.32.5.554

Dennis, A. R., & Kinney, S. T. (1998). Testing media richness theory in the new media: The effects of cues, feedback, and task equivocality. Information Systems Research, 9(3), 256–274. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.9.3.256

Floch, J. M. (2000). Visual identities. Continuum.

Forbes Communications Council. (2024, December 30). The importance of consistency in branding. Forbes.

Foroudi, P., Dinnie, K., Kitchen, P., Melewar, T. C., & Foroudi, M. M. (2017). IMC antecedents and the consequences of planned brand identity in higher education. European Journal of Marketing, 51(3), 528–550. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-08-2015-0615

Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Houghton Mifflin.

Henderson, P. W., & Cote, J. A. (1998). Guidelines for selecting or modifying logos. Journal of Marketing, 62(2), 14–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299806200202

Holm, O. (2006). Integrated marketing communication: From tactics to strategy. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 11(1), 23–33. https://doi.org/10.1108/13563280610643525

Kapferer, J.-N. (2012). The new strategic brand management: Advanced insights and strategic thinking (5th ed.). Kogan Page.

Keller, K. L. (1993). Conceptualising, measuring, and managing customer-based brand equity. Journal of Marketing, 57(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299305700101

Keller, K. L. (2013). Strategic brand management: Building, measuring, and managing brand equity (4th ed.). Pearson.

Kliatchko, J. (2008). Revisiting the IMC construct: A revised definition and four pillars. International Journal of Advertising, 27(1), 133–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2008.11073043

Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2015). Interviews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE Publications.

Mick, D. G., Burroughs, J. E., Hetzel, P., & Brannen, M. Y. (2004). Pursuing the meaning of meaning in the commercial world: An international review of marketing and consumer research founded on semiotics. Semiotica, 152(1/4), 1–74. https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.2004.2004.152-1-4.1

Li, Y. (2025). Computer vision in branding: A conceptual framework and application. Journal of Business Research.

Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed-method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y

Pearce, W. (2020). Visual cross-platform analysis: Digital methods to research visual content. Information, Communication & Society, 23(9), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1590413

Phua, J., Jin, S. V., & Kim, J. (2020). Gratifications of using Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, or Snapchat to follow brands. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 20(2), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/15252019.2019.1707478

Phua, J., Jin, S. V., & Kim, J. (2020). Gratifications of using Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, or Snapchat to follow brands. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 20(2), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/15252019.2019.1707478

Popp, B., & Woratschek, H. (2017). Consumer-brand identification revisited: An integrative framework of brand identification, customer satisfaction, and brand commitment. Journal of Brand Management, 24(3), 240–258. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41262-017-0033-9

Porcu, L., del Barrio-García, S., & Kitchen, P. J. (2019). Integrated marketing communications: A review and a research agenda. International Journal of Advertising, 38(2), 198–235. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2018.1450829

Schwandt, T. A. (1994). Constructivist, interpretivist approaches to human inquiry. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 118–137). SAGE Publications.

Shams, R. (2024). Developing brand identity and sales strategy in the digital era. Journal of Business Research, 163, 113–125.

Siteimprove. (2025, June 24). Achieving brand consistency: Strategies for effective cross-channel messaging. Siteimprove Blog.

Wheeler, A. (2017). Designing brand identity: An essential guide for the whole branding team (5th ed.). Wiley.

Yu, M. (2024). Effects of brand visual identity on consumer attitude: A systematic literature review. Preprints. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-45137/v1